Old people amirite

Older is better

Mmkay

How old are you

Experience counts

69

Nah

I ain’t believing you

O well

Serious

Bad ass retired Marine sniper. Semper Fi

K

@Human Sheeple

Did you read what I said?

Yeah

Apparent and geometric positions of observations in the sky can be moved a significant amount by what we call "moonwave" what you call the movement of different temperature layers of air and the problem with bi-annual parralax measurements is it is warmer in the summer, cooler in the winter

Regardless, it wouldn’t change the fact stellar parallax is observable

REFRACTIVE WAVE OVER THE MOON: https://imgur.com/a/Np1aGgw

I guess I should ask, do you accept trigonometry works?

Yes it will

Do you have a source for the video?

Trigonometry works fine, what a shame light does not follow a straight path

Light usually follows a straight path

Until something distorts it

You can't make a triangle if one or more of your angles is measuring a CURVE

bump

And it won’t, if it’s starlight

From the starlight to the observatory, where does the starlight curve?

Do you understand why?

There’s a reason why you can’t see stars from the lunar surface. Do you know why?

Not even straight in your model

For stars behind the sun yes lol. I thought the star in question right now is Polaris though

You can't prove cause

you can't see black holes

I can’t prove what?

you can't find the dark matter

There are no black holes between us and Polaris

You can't prove shit, you're trying to claim something is a triangle when you know you have a curved line, it ceases to be a triangle and the math is wrong.

The closes black hole is 3000 LY away.