Message from @Timebomb

Discord ID: 558921387159322634

Dillan³
2019-03-23 05:35:37 UTC  

makes sense

Thanos
2019-03-23 05:35:38 UTC  

Who agrees

Dillan³
2019-03-23 05:35:40 UTC  

me

Dillan³
2019-03-23 05:37:28 UTC  

yoof

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:37:29 UTC  

I agree

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:52:33 UTC  

Poor kids..

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:53:19 UTC  

Old people amirite

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:53:54 UTC  

Older is better

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:53:59 UTC  

Mmkay

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:54:05 UTC  

How old are you

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:54:08 UTC  

Experience counts

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:54:12 UTC  

69

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:54:18 UTC  

Nah

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:54:26 UTC  

I ain’t believing you

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:54:36 UTC  

O well

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:54:58 UTC  

Serious

A Search for Roche's Rifle
2019-03-23 05:55:45 UTC  

Bad ass retired Marine sniper. Semper Fi

🅱eans
2019-03-23 05:56:10 UTC  

K

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:53:33 UTC  

@Human Sheeple

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:53:47 UTC  

Did you read what I said?

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:54:02 UTC  

Yeah

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:54:07 UTC  

Apparent and geometric positions of observations in the sky can be moved a significant amount by what we call "moonwave" what you call the movement of different temperature layers of air and the problem with bi-annual parralax measurements is it is warmer in the summer, cooler in the winter

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:54:19 UTC  

Regardless, it wouldn’t change the fact stellar parallax is observable

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:54:34 UTC  

REFRACTIVE WAVE OVER THE MOON: https://imgur.com/a/Np1aGgw

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:54:37 UTC  

I guess I should ask, do you accept trigonometry works?

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:54:38 UTC  

Yes it will

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:54:48 UTC  

Do you have a source for the video?

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:54:56 UTC  

Trigonometry works fine, what a shame light does not follow a straight path

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:55:08 UTC  

Light usually follows a straight path

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:55:08 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/558921661793959961/FlatEarthRefractionUp7.png

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:55:13 UTC  

Until something distorts it

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:55:21 UTC  

You can't make a triangle if one or more of your angles is measuring a CURVE

✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧
2019-03-23 07:55:37 UTC  

bump

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:55:37 UTC  

And it won’t, if it’s starlight

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:55:58 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/558921869487505419/nostars.mp3

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:55:58 UTC  

From the starlight to the observatory, where does the starlight curve?

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:56:21 UTC  

Do you understand why?

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:57:17 UTC  

There’s a reason why you can’t see stars from the lunar surface. Do you know why?

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:57:31 UTC  

Not even straight in your model

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/558922260426129418/LightBendingSpacetime.gif

Timebomb
2019-03-23 07:57:59 UTC  

For stars behind the sun yes lol. I thought the star in question right now is Polaris though

Human Sheeple
2019-03-23 07:58:09 UTC  

You can't prove cause