I WOULD ADD, BECAUSE ALL THINGS ARE CYCLES AND EPICYCLES, AND FOR HOW LONG, AND WHEN?

TO THAT IT SHOULD ALSO BE TACKED ON THAT

EVERYTHING I LEARNED FROM WEED

I HAVE DISCOVERED ALSO THROUGH SIMPLY INTENSE THOUGHT

OR MEDITATION, EITHER WILL WORK

AT THIS POINT

WHILE IT IS FUN TO GET HIGH

I FIND IT DUBIOUS TO ENCOURAGE WEED

FURTHER IT SEEMS TO ME THAT I HAVE NOT GROWN MORE OR LESS EXTREME

BUT FAR LESS EMOTIONAL AND HUMAN IN EXPRESSION

WHICH GENERALLY I LIKE

ALTHOUGH THE EARLIER WRITINGS WERE MORE PASSIONATE

AS IS THE CASE WITH MOST AUTHORS

OK, CARRY ON 😃

If Underworlds can be self sustaining and non-degenerative (static?) as well as righteously and judiciously remain an underworld, is it worth raiding if nobody gets hurt? I don't know if prostitution as it is now known should be included in this (and are Courtesans proper REALLY prostitutes?) as I can see how it is just distasteful but the gays would be an underworld. Hunter S. Thompson would have been an undetectable member of a druggie underworld. The Goths would go back to being an underworld. Underworlds don't really exist anymore. Nobody really seems to understand their true sustained allure and use. Too many normies too much repackaging. Bring back the underworlds, unspoken experimentation among well trusted peers and most of these issues will go away. Especially if we have a Guard Dog Aristocracy vs. a Watch Dog coalition. I am pretty sure that their used to be Underground Counts and the like. Keep it clean and true to purpose and even make the members more useful.

IF WE HAVE A FUNCTIONAL CULTURE

THERE ARE STANDARDS

AND PEOPLE EXCLUDE THOSE WHO DO NOT MEET THE STANDARDS

NO SOVIET-STYLE OBLIGATION TO SUPPORT THEM

Well, there isn't any mandated support here, just keeping habits that don't reflect well and that don't work in mass adoption secret and not advocating for them to be made above ground. I am not talking about anything deleterious either. Would there still be subcultures within cultures if we have a more cohesive culture, ethnic identity and collective goal?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEEmZoFXusc

YES

JUST LIKE CASTES

THERE IS INTERNAL VARIATION

NOTHING IS EQUAL

(WELL EXCEPT FAILURE... ALL FAILURE IS KIND OF EQUAL)

BUT

THIS IS A GOOD THING

THE DIFFERENT PARTS SUPPORT EACH OTHER

No wonder the left loves failure so damn much.

YES

THEY WANT FAILURE => EQUALITY

EQUALITY IS INDIVIDUALISM

Fail alone, fail together, just so long as there is no success to rub it in our damn faces.

WE ALL FAIL TOGETHER

AS ONE BIG HAPPY SUBSTITUTE FAMILY

EVER WONDER WHY THE LEFT HATES FAMILIES?

OTHER THAN THE OBVIOUS

WHICH IS THAT FAMILIES COMPETE WITH IDEOLOGY

FOR LOYALTY

without tradition individualism is equalitarian. but under the diversity regime everything rolls to a low point, a kind of "average" where you must be hobbled by the multicultural collective to be an individual.