NO SOVIET-STYLE OBLIGATION TO SUPPORT THEM

Well, there isn't any mandated support here, just keeping habits that don't reflect well and that don't work in mass adoption secret and not advocating for them to be made above ground. I am not talking about anything deleterious either. Would there still be subcultures within cultures if we have a more cohesive culture, ethnic identity and collective goal?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEEmZoFXusc

YES

JUST LIKE CASTES

THERE IS INTERNAL VARIATION

NOTHING IS EQUAL

(WELL EXCEPT FAILURE... ALL FAILURE IS KIND OF EQUAL)

BUT

THIS IS A GOOD THING

THE DIFFERENT PARTS SUPPORT EACH OTHER

No wonder the left loves failure so damn much.

YES

THEY WANT FAILURE => EQUALITY

EQUALITY IS INDIVIDUALISM

Fail alone, fail together, just so long as there is no success to rub it in our damn faces.

WE ALL FAIL TOGETHER

AS ONE BIG HAPPY SUBSTITUTE FAMILY

EVER WONDER WHY THE LEFT HATES FAMILIES?

OTHER THAN THE OBVIOUS

WHICH IS THAT FAMILIES COMPETE WITH IDEOLOGY

FOR LOYALTY

without tradition individualism is equalitarian. but under the diversity regime everything rolls to a low point, a kind of "average" where you must be hobbled by the multicultural collective to be an individual.

I SEE INDIVIDUALISM AS ALWAYS EGALITARIAN

IT ALLOWS GAMING OF THE SYSTEM

EVERYONE IS EQUAL, BUT WE CAN STILL GAIN POWER/WEALTH IN OTHER WAYS

...WHILE THE OTHERS ARE PARALYZED BY THE IDEA OF EQUALITY

IT IS A MEMETIC _FEVER_

THAT IS

DESIGNED TO KILL OFF OTHERS AS ACTORS

AND SEIZE CONTROL

NO ONE WANTS EQUALITY

IT IS UNNECESSARY

WHEN YOU ARE CONFIDENT AND ABLE

BUT THOSE WHO FEAR... THEY WANT EQUALITY

TO PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL

THIS IS WHY OUR ANCESTORS CALLED THEM SERFS AND MADE THEM PICK BEETS

Even if a school of thought seems good and like it can be made to work, there comes a time when one has to accept that it is just not workable. Even if the majority of the reason is because of others' contributions and pollutants of that school of thought.

That is to say, individualism is no longer "rugged" and is instead parasitic.

Just as crowdism was no longer cohesion, it became mutual atomization. Whatever good these two things had have now gone away and are two poles that curl over and feed into each other.

individualism promotes sociopathy for the ambitious