Message from @-A
Discord ID: 281201666231894028
OK, CARRY ON 😃
If Underworlds can be self sustaining and non-degenerative (static?) as well as righteously and judiciously remain an underworld, is it worth raiding if nobody gets hurt? I don't know if prostitution as it is now known should be included in this (and are Courtesans proper REALLY prostitutes?) as I can see how it is just distasteful but the gays would be an underworld. Hunter S. Thompson would have been an undetectable member of a druggie underworld. The Goths would go back to being an underworld. Underworlds don't really exist anymore. Nobody really seems to understand their true sustained allure and use. Too many normies too much repackaging. Bring back the underworlds, unspoken experimentation among well trusted peers and most of these issues will go away. Especially if we have a Guard Dog Aristocracy vs. a Watch Dog coalition. I am pretty sure that their used to be Underground Counts and the like. Keep it clean and true to purpose and even make the members more useful.
IF WE HAVE A FUNCTIONAL CULTURE
THERE ARE STANDARDS
AND PEOPLE EXCLUDE THOSE WHO DO NOT MEET THE STANDARDS
NO SOVIET-STYLE OBLIGATION TO SUPPORT THEM
Well, there isn't any mandated support here, just keeping habits that don't reflect well and that don't work in mass adoption secret and not advocating for them to be made above ground. I am not talking about anything deleterious either. Would there still be subcultures within cultures if we have a more cohesive culture, ethnic identity and collective goal?
YES
JUST LIKE CASTES
THERE IS INTERNAL VARIATION
NOTHING IS EQUAL
(WELL EXCEPT FAILURE... ALL FAILURE IS KIND OF EQUAL)
BUT
THIS IS A GOOD THING
THE DIFFERENT PARTS SUPPORT EACH OTHER
No wonder the left loves failure so damn much.
YES
THEY WANT FAILURE => EQUALITY
EQUALITY IS INDIVIDUALISM
WE ALL FAIL TOGETHER
AS ONE BIG HAPPY SUBSTITUTE FAMILY
EVER WONDER WHY THE LEFT HATES FAMILIES?
OTHER THAN THE OBVIOUS
WHICH IS THAT FAMILIES COMPETE WITH IDEOLOGY
FOR LOYALTY
without tradition individualism is equalitarian. but under the diversity regime everything rolls to a low point, a kind of "average" where you must be hobbled by the multicultural collective to be an individual.
I SEE INDIVIDUALISM AS ALWAYS EGALITARIAN
IT ALLOWS GAMING OF THE SYSTEM
EVERYONE IS EQUAL, BUT WE CAN STILL GAIN POWER/WEALTH IN OTHER WAYS
...WHILE THE OTHERS ARE PARALYZED BY THE IDEA OF EQUALITY
IT IS A MEMETIC _FEVER_
THAT IS
DESIGNED TO KILL OFF OTHERS AS ACTORS
AND SEIZE CONTROL
NO ONE WANTS EQUALITY
IT IS UNNECESSARY
WHEN YOU ARE CONFIDENT AND ABLE
BUT THOSE WHO FEAR... THEY WANT EQUALITY
TO PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL