Do they have a loft bed too?

An Alt-Righter with opinion on matching shoes and socks properly hatches from the egg

Wrath of Gnon is the #1 ovenposter there is

altright book club Resergence is having our book club meeting in about 15 mins on https://discord.gg/N7EAkcB that discord server. feel free to join us even if you've never read The Master and margarita!

@Jossi I'll skip this one Ever since I haven't got time to read the book due to tons of stuff i've been doing

If you do postpone it in the end i'll have it read

okay we are thinking of putting it off until like the 28 or so

depends on how many people showo up

SODOMIZE

THE

WEAK

AND

HAIL THE

GOAT

http://www.cvltnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/baphomet1-820x820.jpg

@diversity_is_racism the thing I take from quantum physics is that it reaches down into representations and exposes them as such; revealing the world as an incomprehensible dark void of impulses.

If the particle, matter, whatever, doesn't appear in the form we perceive it until it's "observed" but this is the stuff we are made of, than that certainly implies the existence of something outside of that frame which is responsible. More specifically that there is something non-human doing the observation.

A quantum physicist friend of mine said that the observer effect was a misnomer and proffered "perturbation" instead. His view was such that the mere interaction of waveforms was enough to collapse them.

It didn't hit me until now however that Schopenhauer had said about how we are only conscious of something when it resists our will. So if these representations happen regardless of other humans around, the implication is that there is some discrete, multitudinous *will* at this level which, when bumping shoulders, gives rise to this very basic grade of existence we try to make sense out of using physics.

Got off track a bit. There is no god.

So anyway that perturbation is what Schopenhauer was describing from a different lense

It's cool shit

I'm incapable of taking that deeper so don't probe me bb

I don't even know if this would be anything but junk science, to be honest. I don't know that there is something wrong with it, I don't suspect to the point that I would dismiss it but, there are trends in the scientific field that are way too humanist for their own good. Maybe observation does nothing and we just like to think it does?

The conclusion wouldn't be that you can sprout tentacles out of your arm

We definitely experience the effect

so it shouldn't be discarded

That does not mean that a phenomenon is dependent on observation. But I understand the point.

it just means that phenomena are the result of shoulders bumping, more or less. Without such "perturbations" the world is indeterminate potential I guess. That doesn't really matter though.

Since we can't know the answer

No. At least, not off of the models we have now. All of the uncertainty gives egg heads something to do.

We'll never get there

But once we stop trying, we are just going to atrophy. That is the tragedy of the workaholic. I guess we could breed temperaments that make do with uncertainty without stagnance and atrophy.

We could devote energy into how to live instead

ethics

Not to mention the other pillars.

Imagine all of the theorizing that we get today going into high art. Music, painting, sculpting: all of these ideas of how the more subtle world would look to our material eyes and sound to our ears. It would at least be more interesting to me.

It would hit an epistemological crisis all the same

Don't the artsy types thrive in crisis? They love it.

"well fuck, how do you write a good tune."

All of the musicians disagreeing though working at their very best could make an all new explosion of genres and enhance already existing ones. See, they would be creating something. That would fulfill them even with all of their doubts.

yeah but that's not usually the result of theorizing

Theorizing is deconstructive

rationality that is