Message from @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻
Discord ID: 284751406064336897
with some scrutiny it is an inescapeable conclusion
that some configuration of matter and energy itself cannot explain consciousness
it can explain how our brains work
but not why at all they work
what you talked about did not address the main issue of consciousness
is it appropriate to conclude that it works because it must
of course it works
but that doesn't explain consciousness is what I am saying
why not?
because we are unable to say what it is about it that actually makes "consciousness"
It's not materialist dude.
it is explicitly so
Matter is just a representation
There's no such thing as matter
I agree with that actually
matter is "existing"
existing in time
What does that have to do with the intelligibility of the world persisting in spite of fragmented perceptions?
the afterlife will have a "material" element as much as life does for instance
And about what you said.
thq qualia problem is a good illustration of why consciousness cannot be reduced to this
There is no mind body problem
At all
if all you are saying is consciousness cannot exist in time
i.e. we cannot think
without all of that
I don't disagree
but it doesn't address the basic phenomenon or quality of consciousness
A ball kicked doesn't return to you until a wall it hits reverses its motion. Did the ball have its will to continue forward resisted by the wall? Rather than that, the ball is constantly reacting to its environment, and in the same sense, your senses are constant receivers of stimulus.
it makes more sense to me to consider our configurations
like prisms
or lenses
which focus undifferentiated consciousness
"<hella_pitted> what you guys call order is merely abstract patterns we invent out of representions." Why could we represent?
Why isn't that an impossible task?
In truth we had found the key
But its application would unravel this mystery
Why could we pattern*
Consciousness can't be fundamental like that
what is there to be conscious of