another one: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SwcqGN3B3TE/hqdefault.jpg
East Pakistan
yeah, until 1971
but Bengal is split between India and Bangladesh
there are lots of ethnocultural Bengalis in India
they divided it sort of along hindu/muslim lines
they all have brown eyes
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6a/ff/c6/6affc64fb03ad9e626881969aa437969.jpg
a light eyed GSB
FITS WITH THE EUROPEAN PATERNAL LINE AND ASIATIC MATERNAL LINE
They look smart
They don't look half Asian
Mostly caucasoid
they tend to be quite well to do, in mercantile and STEM fields, and have a big expat population
so their supremacy is not simply historical/mythological
@devolved PROBABLY NOT A QUESTION OF HALVES
DEPENDS ON PROPORTION
IN ORIGINAL GROUP
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/05/genetics-random-truths/
TEN VIKINGS AND FIVE ASIAN WIVES
while south indian brahmins do tend to look more caucasoid than their surrounding populations
the actual difference comes out in geography
the more north and west you go
the more caucasoid people become
this is despite there not being any significant admixture in a lot of these clans for 4000+ years
which is quite insane
http://www.harappadna.org/2011/06/caste-is-not-ancestrally-arbitrary/
I don't buy that the maternal line was Asian like mongoloid
Maybe a mix already by time aryans showed up
Asian, dravidian, armenian, semitic
absolutely was not
asiatic doesn't necessarily mean slants though
to be fair
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
average IQ is not a useful measure in areas where there is a lot of stratification
like say, Iran
Iran obviously produces very smart top level scientists
and also has the stuff you expect from a middle to low IQ spot
whereas a place with more uniformity, you would never get the former
endogamy is simply no longer a thing in the west, but is a pretty big thing in the rest of the world
but this is usually ignored by researchers because it barely occurs to them unless they have a specific interest in a certain area or are non-Western
