Message from @Apollo'sJest

Discord ID: 337273245663494144


2017-07-19 16:39:56 UTC  

to bolster your point

2017-07-19 16:40:04 UTC  

i.e. bad faith

2017-07-19 16:40:51 UTC  

Ok, lemme go through what you said again and see were I might have potentially lost the plot

2017-07-19 16:40:54 UTC  

Any hints?

2017-07-19 16:41:14 UTC  

okay

2017-07-19 16:41:22 UTC  

sure, yes of course

2017-07-19 16:41:30 UTC  

what you said about the french president etc. is irrelevant

2017-07-19 16:41:36 UTC  

what I said was in response to what you said about councils

2017-07-19 16:41:43 UTC  

a tribal council is not the normal state of organization of a tribe

2017-07-19 16:42:02 UTC  

or its highly unusual for this to be the case

2017-07-19 16:42:19 UTC  

if you scale down society to hunter gatherer level, then sure

2017-07-19 16:42:31 UTC  

so like kings can have ministers and councils

2017-07-19 16:42:34 UTC  

so can tribes have councils

2017-07-19 16:42:43 UTC  

yet, the chief/elder exists nevertheless as the head

2017-07-19 16:42:49 UTC  

and would tend to head any such council

2017-07-19 16:43:13 UTC  

But... We live in a world dominated by republican systems.... Are you proposing that this occurance in nature is unnatura?

2017-07-19 16:43:20 UTC  

like I said

2017-07-19 16:43:23 UTC  

lets not worry about unnatural

2017-07-19 16:43:27 UTC  

also, I never said anything about any other system

2017-07-19 16:43:28 UTC  

ok

2017-07-19 16:43:52 UTC  

No, but I bring it up (as an example) of something *else* occuring in nature

2017-07-19 16:43:54 UTC  

I'm not for or against monarchy

2017-07-19 16:44:10 UTC  

however yes I would say republican systems are unnatural

2017-07-19 16:44:16 UTC  

how so?

2017-07-19 16:44:21 UTC  

in the sense that they require a certain setup of civilization

2017-07-19 16:44:31 UTC  

they can only occur at a certain level of societal development and scale

2017-07-19 16:44:36 UTC  

and inevitably

2017-07-19 16:44:38 UTC  

such a setup is temporary

2017-07-19 16:44:48 UTC  

it will always fail, and always default back to kings

2017-07-19 16:44:52 UTC  

rome is a great example

2017-07-19 16:45:05 UTC  

that it will fail doesn't mean its not worth doing or whatever

2017-07-19 16:45:07 UTC  

but its the case

2017-07-19 16:45:14 UTC  

the history of man is a history of kings, not republics

2017-07-19 16:46:41 UTC  

unnatural is a very loaded word, I stand by what I said but it carries connotations of disgust, undesirability etc.

2017-07-19 16:46:44 UTC  

I don't mean those

2017-07-19 16:47:04 UTC  

I actually agree with the seamingly temporary nature of Republics but your original point (the one that I called retarded af) was that monarchy is the natural state of human society. You realise that recorded History is a small fraction of our species history right?

2017-07-19 16:47:05 UTC  

it's possible to raise children in a communal environment

2017-07-19 16:47:18 UTC  

the argument there is you can see an obvious step up

2017-07-19 16:47:22 UTC  

from society at small scale

2017-07-19 16:47:22 UTC  

For most of our existance we were naked apes in jungles...