Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 350051133135257601
communists don't protest
that is against the rules of true bolshevism
@Deleted User 57835c2c WORK ON YOUR DICKTATION
RATHER THAN BLAMING OTHERS FOR MISSING "THE POINT"
see in the Socialist Revolutionary party, there was a split between bolsheviks and eveyrone else
the bolsheviks probably having the support of most of the peasants, who like tosee shit just get done
no
the peasants supported people who do shit
the thing is they all want MORE PROPERTY FOR THEMSELVEs
but oppose giving up all their personal property almost always in communist revolutions
see the USSR and China
and zimbabwe
and venezuela
they all take the initial free hand out
of land from the richer peasants / estates
but most of them don't even want to see the land lord shot
they just want to humiliate him
and take his extra stuff
the most ironic is that the USSR and China did gave lands to the people
they almost all respondwith violence to attempts totake hteir stuff
yeah but in both cases the peasants responded with violence towards what htey perceived to be the state taking their land
and they could manage them properly for example in the NEP and in the China from 1949-1953-54
and they were right
yes
then the governement started to involve and everything went to hell
well the government didn't want toredistribute land
they wanted to seize the land
because they were afraid of a new burgueoise class
to use the exports
to pay for industrialization
also that
and the peasants new that
as even though they're uneducated, lower iq people
they're not stupid
basically they starved the peasants to feed the cities.
yes
well mao was more just pure idiocy
no they are more conected with their instinct or something like that
stalin was exporting grain from a starving country
no it is that they see how agriculture works
firsthand