"HONEYPOT" WHY?

i know what you mean

i'm not sure who is an informant other than david duke

and who is just dumb

it's just paranoia

but it's not paranoid in today's world

I am not even that paranoid because I know I am on plenty of lists already

IT WOULD BE A HONEYPOT IF YOU DISCUSSED THINGS LIKE DRIVING A CARNIVAL CRUISE SHIP INTO THE NEW WTC WITH A BUNCH OF ALT LEFT FURRIES TO PROTEST DONNIE J T

you miss the point again entirely

the us government / criminal justice system is actually far to the right of the leftists

the point is not that it is, in actual fact, a honey pot, but that Voat gives me the heeby jeebies

at google

even the libtards and affirmative action babies in it

see the supreme court hate speech decision

and the reasoning "if you prohibit this, when someon eelse omes to power, he will just outlaw you"

which is what antifa and the leftists / crypto wannabe commies don't get

yes

real commies would:
1. seize power
2. shoot everyone who complains
3. do what they want

communists don't protest

that is against the rules of true bolshevism

@Deleted User 57835c2c WORK ON YOUR DICKTATION

RATHER THAN BLAMING OTHERS FOR MISSING "THE POINT"

see in the Socialist Revolutionary party, there was a split between bolsheviks and eveyrone else

the bolsheviks probably having the support of most of the peasants, who like tosee shit just get done

no

the peasants supported people who do shit

the thing is they all want MORE PROPERTY FOR THEMSELVEs

but oppose giving up all their personal property almost always in communist revolutions

see the USSR and China

and zimbabwe

and venezuela

they all take the initial free hand out

of land from the richer peasants / estates

but most of them don't even want to see the land lord shot

they just want to humiliate him

and take his extra stuff

the most ironic is that the USSR and China did gave lands to the people

they almost all respondwith violence to attempts totake hteir stuff

yeah but in both cases the peasants responded with violence towards what htey perceived to be the state taking their land

and they could manage them properly for example in the NEP and in the China from 1949-1953-54

and they were right