Message from @Exilarch
Discord ID: 385506707620626443
Confucius also
I dont really consider them Royalty
because none of them are "noble"
and none have any merit
or skills, im assuming
What is a King without a mastery in a skill? Bloodline and Inheritance doesnt cut it
I suspect that the word "noble" has changed meaning
from being naturally virtuous, to having inherited land ownership
Ideally a king would accept any challenge from a commoner
testing his skill
or might
and rightfully so
that's retarded
I think the virtuous are easily corrupted
if he did your thing the king would spend 25 hours a day beating peasants at chess instead of running his country
No he would duel like once a year because the last victim was disemboweled in front of the entire city.
Might and Intellect.
not spoiled too much by the comforts that royalty brings.
If you are going to rule with an Iron fist, you should sleep on an Iron bed.
How many monarchs embraced austerity?
His people are a huge fan of him as well
I think he was a swell guy who did nothing wrong
retards->pikes is a cheap, simple, effective and psychologically powerful solution to many problems
Yeah he earned his right to rule.
Back when mutilating your enemies got you chicks
he got exiled like whitey in south africa and then after like 4 years the country fell apart and they came to find him in the woods and beg him to return and run the show and impale spergs again
brothers and fathers killed
father*
The golden chalice
at the centre of the city
or town well or w.e it was
Vlad the Impaler was great except that he sometimes killed his own peasants for dubious reasons
he couldn't control his bloodlust enough
Yeah well killing Turks all day takes its toll
But he was still a champion who managed to resist Orwellian mind control
and who knew how to deal with Mohammedans
yes
brown skin->pike
the original cannibal lolocaust
He piked more than dark skinned people