Exilarch (Discord ID: 383004704931577856), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
2,704 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/11 | Next
you think you can get him to comply to your morals he doesn't share by appealing to your religion that he doesn't believe in?
just curious what is your original accusation he is deflecting from
he does not speak in monotone, have you even heard him talk before?
you are just a mad sperg making up stuff to justify your sperg rage at him
and why are you spewing it at nonbelievers who a mature person would obviously know would just make fun of it
why are you fucking losers sitting around arguing with internet strangers
I am not a nerd, I do not base my self image off of software choices
see I'm gonna do the smart thing and go do something productive instead of arguing with spergs for hours
cover the bottom half of her face and tell me you don't see a gook
oh also her face is shifted, her maxillae are too long
her eyes are higher than they ought to be, in other words
not gonna go all 9001 hours in photoshop for her sake, but can you see how when her eyes are moved down on her face, she looks vastly less fucked up?
I am just proud that my mind zeroed in on the exact thing wrong with her
I feel like normies would've gone years going "lol something off bout hurr"
I had a bio teacher spend like a whole lecture on trying to disprove the bible
like in real life what is it you're trying to do
so 2d pyfagorean theorem gives you the hypotenuse length, if you add a dimension does it give you the triangle's area?
like if you take 3 line segments, does it give you the area of the triangle between the points?
just trying to understand the application concept
so in the 3d version, where you had 3 vectors at right angle, what would the result of that tell you
nigger turn down your autism, just answer my questions straight so I can understand
wait... so if you had 3 vectors perpendicular, all with magnitude 1, that theorem would give you sqrt3, like 1.7
what does that magnitude equal in actual geometry
so you have 3 vectors 1 unit long all perpendicular, then 1.7ish as the result of the formula, but what is the 1.7? distance from what to what?
J do you suppose you could draw me a quick MSpaint pic?
WPWW needs to clean up his presentation. I like to watch his thoughts because he's smart and gets stuff done so I don't talk trash, but a bit of clarity would be nice
you seem useful autistic though, not dumb autistic
I've met plenty of spergs who can't do 1% what you are doing
I do things like you are doing with simpler math and with finance applications in mind
never bothered doing differentials, kindawish I had, mean to pick up a book on it but I can't make myself tism hard enough for it
yeah that looks tight, you can map between non euclidean and euclidean geometries that way
in my field I am notorious for being the guy who actually digs up the first papers on the subject and traces the chain of discovery from the beginning, questioning basic assumptions along the way. I think it's really important to do that
yeah and even more, if you understand why it needed to be derived
I wish I had more of a reason to finish learning it
so far I haven't really encountered any problem I need it to solve in my own life though, for better or for worse
for whatever reason my life has taught me to be attentive to quality and big picture/situation/context more than precise quantity
morning migraine, now coked up on an assload of caffeine, stumbling and groaning
yeah and as you applied it to a specific goal you desired, you probably remember it more easily
you should post these gifs on r/dataisbeautiful and r/oddlysatisfying
if I were fuhrer he's the guy I would commission to make the deep learning software to crunch racial quality scores from a huge database of profiles containing a few head photographs and other personal info
math is one of those things that seems to improve by revelation/"eureka!" moments
only makes sense that it requires backing off to let things settle in your mind at times
this is why I am entirely fine with space nazi government system, promote this man in the hive just for being born talented
this dude is just talking about his video game engines
calm your autism, there will be other opportunities for you to propagandize and repeat amerika boilerplate
@zeusbolt in other words, altright is not a valuable social brand. There is no reason for a person to go "Oh, he is altright, I can count on him to have the following valuable characteristics that make him worth associating with," as opposed to other social brands
@diversity_is_racism if that's the case, doesn't that mean people ought to be recruited to the altright to build the brand? find ultra intense passionate adventurous types, recruit them to represent the brand, just like a company would.
Issue: incentives vs risks
@diversity_is_racism ...and sticking up for your own team
Why does nobody ever point out that "Trending" articles are literally just global announcements/pinned topics renamed with the implication that they are organically popular at a grassroots level?
power struggle over ring->ring gives power->was created by powerful people->who?->elves
guy farts around with elves->omg elves worried about ring, sumthin goin down lol->omg ring gives powarr->omg elves are the ones who made it!!! Dun dun DUNNN~!
thus, reversing the format allows working up the chain of "why?" questions to become plot twists
man in a desert writes a book->book causes a huge war
man in a desert writes a book->book contains esoteric semi-sorcery knowledge->book causes a huge war over how the knowledge ought to be used. Part of the struggle is d/t side effect of the sorcery
the way the book works, you make a wish, you can get the wish, however something bad happens to you, the wish is granted in such a way that it burns you ultimately, UNLESS you sacrifice to it by harming others to offset it.
this creates the ideologic schism. Some say that, since it is inevitable people will be harmed by the sorcery, it's important to round up the worst of society and use them as human cattle to sacrifice for the betterment of man
other spergs say "no that's bad, we have to stop this because it's not egalitarian," however, by Maximum Power Principle, they MUST utilize the book's teachings in order to compete successfully against the other side
so, to do the opposite of the "wrong" ideology, they make sure to randomize it as a lottery, Hunger Games style so it's "equal." Later in the book they can outright target the most attractive and talented
here's why the egalitarians stay in power: how much negative effect is offset is proportional to the overall quality/metaphysical value of those sacrificed
yeah and then you have the cracks begin to show and their society go to shit, and the witch hunts only intensify
looking to burn more 100+ IQ people to keep their shamble of a world going
you could even do it so by the time the character is on the scene, they literally have forgotten how to do anything the old fashioned way, they just know how to sacrifice smart people to the book
you could set it up so the good guys win, except it's an ersatz win, a potemkin win that is slowly crumbling, and life is actually horrible
could finish this whole plot idea, reorder it so it becomes a series of discoveries and plot twists in the eyes of the reader, then render it into bullet points, submit the bullet points to a talent pool to write chapter by chapter, submit those to an editorial tank, have it done in a month
yeah I noticed it watching ergo proxy I think. Huge plot twist, and I was like "wait a minute, the guy writing it knew this the whole time, so all they did was write the whole story around this point and then not tell the viewer until later on, then it seemed mind blowing"
I am actually going to take that one plot and run with it, as a proof of concept
I will get it to where it is good and say "what if I could outline something this good or better every single month like clockwork, with no formulaicism or repetition?"
I am beginning to suspect that, as POCs cannot tell jews apart from whites (thanks largely to the inclusion of italians), for political purposes whites and jews will all go up against the wall as evil POC oppressors if the current libs get their way
there seems to be an argument for it. Some jews pull the whole "we aren't wyte, we're JOOISH" angle, but at the same time libshits are starting to have radical anti israel sentiment, especially now that they've incorporated muslims who are often clever enough to be extremely subversive
a giant lynchmob gang of Everyone vs. whites and jews
this article actually does a pretty good job substantiating my argument that liberals cannot tell jews apart from whites
considering your own appearance/name with its obvious beaner influences, it's pretty funny you of all people are getting such a kick out of the mongrel meem
I mean don't get me wrong, it's a great meme, I just don't get how you can be the meme and still laugh at the meme
one thing I noticed about dalits such as christians is they only allow their way to survive and look good based on the power and talent they got from the past
for example, a white aryan who was bred by thousands of years of eugenics in west asia and whose race conquered europe by force and genocided/replaced the natives will turn christian and make a big show of being handsome, intelligent, athletic, sociable, and CHRISTIAN
he will turn all of that stuff that hard inequality gave his kind for generations into a mere prop to advertise dalitianity
he will pretend that he is a strong healthy intelligent aryan because of his christian faith, when really adhering to his religion causes brown retards with no standards over time, he still has those traits only because his ideology hasn't had enough generations to really kick in
in the case of the alt right DEUS VULT types, it becomes absolutely comical if you actually know anything about anything, either from history books or from just using your two eyes to pay attention to how things seem to really turn out
some retard tradcat on a forum getting mad that america is getting beanerized while southern Europe only stopped being blond nordics because of retards like him yelling DOOS VAULT a thousand years ago and helping to spread the holy universal egalitarian religion that imported north africans and arabs
take that mongrel meme face and put it on a papist robe body
today, our plague is the SJW. the SJW push universalist egalitarianism. They were not the first to come up with these ideas however, so who gave them the idea?
Well, SJW are just the next generation of 1968 civil rights spergs, who were just the american branch of marxism with a lot of ties between groups
so if they are essentially marxists going about enforcing universal equality, where did they get the idea?
you may recall that the alt right was called the dark enlightenment at one point, this is why
enlightenment philosophy was, however, a rebellion against the catholic church... for not being catholic enough
essentially, spergs in the catholic church got mad that "liberty, equality, fraternity" was being practiced insufficiently... by those same catholics who preached it in the first place
well yes, it is hierarchical, but only because it inherited a more hierarchical society to parasitize
at first extremely hierarchical feudal europeans inherit a religion that tells them everyone is equal
then after a while people say "wait a minute this nobility and pope business is not egalitarian enough! I thought the religion said we were equal!" and so they dethroned the kings and the pope and became protestants and seculars still obsessed about equality, with a slightly flatter hierarchy
then the marxists did it again, another "You people aren't egalitarian enough! >_<" plus flattening of hierarchy
now with SJW flashmob tactics the hierarchy is almost entirely flat, I don't know how they could get it flatter
but people look at classical european society with its heavy catholic influences and fundamentally misattribute the beauty, grandeur, hierarchy and organization of that society as being catholic in origin
really what they are looking at is the results of thousands of years of living one way, building up that race and society, then suddenly slapping catholic labels on everything, and then at the snapshot in history they show you with renaissance paintings and shit, you see all of the wonderful stuff before it decayed but with CATHOLIC 😃 written on it in bold face
it's like having an athlete work out hard and eat a shitload of protein for 10 years, then for 2 weeks become a vegan and do nothing but meditate, and then turn around and say "his body is the way it is because of veganism and meditation"
it wouldn't have happened, but something like it would have
what we're discussing is the fact that "golden era catholicism" preached a doctrine that eliminated the conditions its own existence requires
it requires talent, loyalty, vision and hierarchy to have that sort of catholic age/culture, but the elimination of talent/loyalty/vision/hierarchy is the logical conclusion of catholic doctrine
that's a neat topic, if only that's what we were talking about
well another thing @spacetimed is that people point to hierarchical/tribal stuff in the bible as evidence for why catholicism is fascist or whatever
they are entirely right about that, as far as I can tell from having read the hell out of the book several times, even the new testament was an entirely tribal guide for how the people "in the club" should be ultra super nice to each other, but blatantly listing exclusion criteria, people to kick out and not associate with, etc
and italians actually tend to act like that, I admit
the problem however is that the equality dogma their church has been pushing for the last ~1700 years is not actually in their book
the niceans blatantly cherry picked religious works to try to support their agenda, like if Amerika.org were taken as ultimate truth but you put Reddit in charge of editing the condensed version of Ultimate Truth
they would go through and find the one line where prozak said racism is bad, take that part,then throw out tons of other work that contradicted that assertion
when you read a Kang James Bible, that is effectively what you are reading
some people strongly assert that they had a role in either the Nicean tampering, or that they fabricated the whole NT as a ploy to soften the goys
that they literally used it as memetic warfare 2000 years ago when we were all living in one room houses and traveling by caravan, that's basically the Der Ewige Jude theory
that they were the aggressor from the start, and they made up a whole book of religion to ruin us
they screwed up their own religion too, following the same pattern as the other christians
wow what the fuck look at this
```The King James Version (KJV), also known as the King James Bible (KJB) or simply the Authorized Version (AV), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed in 1611.[a] The books of the King James Version include the 39 books of the Old Testament, an intertestamental section containing 14 books of the Apocrypha (most of which correspond to books in the Vulgate Deuterocanon adhered to by Roman Catholics), and the 27 books of the New Testament.```
in the 1600s there were 14 additional books of the bible included in the KJV
just in the last 400 years of dalitianity, they have removed 14 entire books from the KJV
those 14 books must've contradicted their platform of liberte, egalite, farternite
I discuss my thoughts pretty openly and I don't pull punches, but I don't like to do it at church anymore
I'll happily discuss my thoughts with mormons at a neutral location
no, mormons worship the doctrine of Spencer W. Kimball (who contradicted every prophet before him hugely) and also the BYU honor code
and Mitt Romney and general conservadad republicanism
what actual God might have revealed to Joseph Smith or Brigham Young, these are of secondary importance, and if they contradict the former, are bitterly stigmatized
Joseph Smith's? Yeah it stands to reason, but fun fact, that story is tampered as well
there is an official version printed in every copy of the mormon scriptures
but if you actually dig up the old cursive written documents by joseph smith, there were other details added and removed
there were like 4 different versions he said, all were roughly the same but slightly different descriptors were used in one of them, and the modern church zeroed in on it and decided, "THAT is what Joseph saw!"
it's called the Joseph Smith Papers, you can just google it even
but off the top of my head, it said the gods appeared to him in a pillar of flame, old testament style, not a pillar of light like the LDS say
just a small detail really, I could reread it again
I actually believe Joseph Smith entirely - to the point that I am forced to disbelieve my church
well, because I do not believe it works like that
they all are, I move all over the country and go to mormon churches while I travel
that, plus they are silly people who take religion quite lightly
most of them have barely studied the book of mormon at all, much less read all of it
even fewer of them have actually read the entire 4 books we believe in
bible, book of mormon, doctrine & covenants, pearl of great price
there are huge volumes of writing by brigham young and people high in the church, quite well documented, something like 8000 pages of it. The number of mormons who even KNOW about it is so small that it rounds to zero
the number of people who actually read it all... well, let's put it this way, if I actually read it all, I might literally be the only one
if I did that, I might be literally the most studied mormon on the face of the whole earth
Brigham Young unambiguously stated that nordic people were God's chosen race
if I was called by a divine being to do it, I would do it, but if that did not happen I would never do it, and I would never fake it
it's just hard to read page after page of doctrine explaining how God told them to establish a PERFECT society, and I read it and it actually DOES sound perfect, and then to have to know that it was taken away entirely by normal stupid people
if he conned people into explosively populating nordic people out in the woods, living wild and free with guns and bowie knives and race warring against indians, how is that a bad thing even if it's all fake?
I believe him to the letter, but how would that be bad even if he just lied
that would be a very productive lie to say the least, he almost resulted in an all nordic country being made
so they /might/ have been real people once, otherwise are representative of useful principles that teach us stuff in stories passed down
doesn't make it bad, but how are you to tell me these are "the true gods" when you just blatantly said of your own words that you are not even sure they exist
while that is true, you asserted your **gods** existed, and were the true gods
Parasite - Today at 11:41 PM
because it draws away from the true gods
and denies the natural order```
atheist larping as a pagan because it sounds metal and fun
you just said the gods are not even beings, and you said they don't even exist
2,704 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/11 | Next