Message from @∑☩American 4th Position (Vish)☯∑
Discord ID: 401785342765826049
IT IS AS BIZARRE AS WHITE SUICIDE
@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ POLISH AND ITALIAN? SO, LIKE A WHITE GUY THAT'S 25% ASIAN/BERBER?
None of you ever found me the pdf I asked for homos
WHICH WAS? PROBABLY IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND
SOCIAL PATHOLOGY: http://www.amerika.org/politics/how-crowdism-destroys-all-good-things/
SOMEDAY I WANT TO WRITE FOR THESE GUYS: https://www.city-journal.org/html/crudeness-and-truth-15668.html
LOOKING FORWARD TO SILICON VALLEY GETTING REAMED: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-12/silicon-valley-will-pay-the-price-for-its-lefty-leanings
ANALLY, HOPEFULLY
JAMES DAMORE WITH A SIX FOOT STRAP-ON
OH LOOK, THE ENTITLEMENTS STATE IS BEGINNING ITS DEATH ARC: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-healthcare-medicaid-kentucky/kentucky-becomes-first-u-s-state-to-implement-medicaid-work-requirements-idUSKBN1F128R
HALF OF WHITE YOUTHS NOT INSANE: https://www.amren.com/news/2018/01/half-white-american-youths-believe-diversity-harm/
The second independence may yet come
Actually, it will
the question is how cleanly
AGREED
CIVIL WAR 2.0
IF ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE DEMOCRATS, WHY SHOULD WE SUPPORT THEM? https://www.reddit.com/r/askaconservative/comments/7pwtsk/should_conservatives_use_practical_political/
@diversity_is_racism so the study says this one group displace genetically all three groups. From what I understand they don't know where this group came from genetically. I see two possible origins. the three groups that originally came to Europe evolved through hybridization forming this group with new mutations. I don't think this is accurate.
To me there had to be a fourth group.
The second scenario: the three groups there who originally were there did minimum cross breeding or one group was bigger than the other two. This other group came from a location that allowed them to be separate from the others genetically. Something happened that caused a mass migration. The 4.2 ka bp event happened at that time. The majority of early bell beaker artifacts are found in Spain the coast of Britain, Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway.
The only landmass that has been confirmed is doggerland. But doggerland is said to have sunk around 8,000 years ago. Unless they are wrong. Have you came across anything that would contribute or clear things up to these scenarios?
doggoland
i don't understand your confusion
maybe the stonehenge people were very few in number
do you think the bell-beaker people were aryans
I think stone henge wasn't built by them they occupied the land. If Stonehenge was a stand alone structure then I would agree with them. But everywhere the bell beaker culture is found they have the exact same architecture. Woodhenges and other stone henge.
Here is an example of one.
http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/4300-year-old-woodhenge-germany-revealed-public-first-time-006224
but that's what the article says
that bell-beaker people, or whatever the newcomers were, didn't build stonehenge
Yes but the bell beaker culture built exact same buildings. This would suggest that the earlier people were used as labor or it was built by Aryans as trading Post
Or Outpost for there growth
hmmm
or perhaps that german "woodhenge" was built by similar people to the people who built stonehenge, who were both later replaced
The only thing that was close to them in architecture was the hunter gatherers stone circles
or, you have different groups of people who are copying each other's architecture
The genetics of the people found at the different sites are the bell beaker
according to the article you first posted there was no real bell beaker "people"
it was a cultural phenomenon
who knows if that's true
it could have been a very small elite presiding over different groups of people in different places
New genetic tests show bell beaker were the same