Message from @devolved

Discord ID: 401792439255433226


2018-01-13 16:21:31 UTC  

AGREED

2018-01-13 16:21:34 UTC  

CIVIL WAR 2.0

2018-01-13 16:21:47 UTC  
2018-01-13 17:20:07 UTC  

@diversity_is_racism so the study says this one group displace genetically all three groups. From what I understand they don't know where this group came from genetically. I see two possible origins. the three groups that originally came to Europe evolved through hybridization forming this group with new mutations. I don't think this is accurate.
To me there had to be a fourth group.
The second scenario: the three groups there who originally were there did minimum cross breeding or one group was bigger than the other two. This other group came from a location that allowed them to be separate from the others genetically. Something happened that caused a mass migration. The 4.2 ka bp event happened at that time. The majority of early bell beaker artifacts are found in Spain the coast of Britain, Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway.

The only landmass that has been confirmed is doggerland. But doggerland is said to have sunk around 8,000 years ago. Unless they are wrong. Have you came across anything that would contribute or clear things up to these scenarios?

2018-01-13 17:26:37 UTC  

doggoland

2018-01-13 17:27:49 UTC  

i don't understand your confusion

2018-01-13 17:28:32 UTC  

maybe the stonehenge people were very few in number

2018-01-13 17:30:21 UTC  

do you think the bell-beaker people were aryans

2018-01-13 17:33:48 UTC  

I think stone henge wasn't built by them they occupied the land. If Stonehenge was a stand alone structure then I would agree with them. But everywhere the bell beaker culture is found they have the exact same architecture. Woodhenges and other stone henge.
Here is an example of one.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/4300-year-old-woodhenge-germany-revealed-public-first-time-006224

2018-01-13 17:34:28 UTC  

but that's what the article says

2018-01-13 17:34:46 UTC  

that bell-beaker people, or whatever the newcomers were, didn't build stonehenge

2018-01-13 17:36:45 UTC  

Yes but the bell beaker culture built exact same buildings. This would suggest that the earlier people were used as labor or it was built by Aryans as trading Post

2018-01-13 17:37:05 UTC  

Or Outpost for there growth

2018-01-13 17:37:50 UTC  

hmmm

2018-01-13 17:38:27 UTC  

or perhaps that german "woodhenge" was built by similar people to the people who built stonehenge, who were both later replaced

2018-01-13 17:38:34 UTC  

The only thing that was close to them in architecture was the hunter gatherers stone circles

2018-01-13 17:38:49 UTC  

or, you have different groups of people who are copying each other's architecture

2018-01-13 17:39:09 UTC  

The genetics of the people found at the different sites are the bell beaker

2018-01-13 17:39:36 UTC  

according to the article you first posted there was no real bell beaker "people"

2018-01-13 17:39:42 UTC  

it was a cultural phenomenon

2018-01-13 17:39:46 UTC  

who knows if that's true

2018-01-13 17:40:07 UTC  

it could have been a very small elite presiding over different groups of people in different places

2018-01-13 17:40:14 UTC  

New genetic tests show bell beaker were the same

2018-01-13 17:51:36 UTC  

Here is what the Aryan scriptures describes as the oldland. It had 12 main rivers that splinter off into hundreds of smaller rivers which only they could navigate.

www.the-stonehenge-enigma.info/2012/10/south-downs-and-more-conclusive.html?m=1

This is what Britain used to look like. By finding all the dry river beds in Britain they found that they were being used until around four thousand years ago.

2018-01-13 17:53:02 UTC  

The only writing we have from them is in this book that was a collection writings from these old citadel walls

2018-01-13 17:53:16 UTC  

This is what it describes

2018-01-13 17:54:37 UTC  

what book

2018-01-13 17:54:47 UTC  

Oera Lind book

2018-01-13 17:55:20 UTC  

Aka Aryan scriptures. It is considered a forgery by mainstream

2018-01-13 17:55:32 UTC  

yeah

2018-01-13 17:55:36 UTC  

looks like a hoax to me

2018-01-13 17:55:54 UTC  

Themes running through the Oera Linda Book include catastrophism, nationalism, matriarchy, and mythology. The text alleges that Europe and other lands were, for a large part of their history, ruled by a succession of folk-mothers presiding over a hierarchical order of celibate priestesses dedicated to the goddess Frya, daughter of the creator god Wr-alda and Jrtha, the earth mother.

2018-01-13 17:56:04 UTC  

da matriarchy

2018-01-13 17:56:15 UTC  

joseph campbell tries to claim the same thing

2018-01-13 17:56:24 UTC  

that ancient societies were all "matriarchies"

2018-01-13 17:56:27 UTC  

it's bullshit

2018-01-13 17:56:48 UTC  

So I have study the book and I have found is that copy paste is not accurate at all

2018-01-13 17:57:21 UTC  

For one only men could be politicians

2018-01-13 17:57:35 UTC  

Two only married men could have a house

2018-01-13 18:00:00 UTC  

Three the woodhenge found in the article in Germany was discovered in the early 90s it is the citadel the Oera Linda book describes.

If it was a forgery then how did the forgers know about a nation that had Citadels who practice one religion and were one race?