Message from @Mother
Discord ID: 430356919601987586
We also could do this with nietzsche and kacysznki and herzl.
I anticipate your response would not vary.
Which is why you surround yourself with people whose IQs are lower than yours, or in the case of crow, people who don't read theory.
You should replace evola's picture with Bibi Netanyahu's.
varg vs the wogs
VARG REMAINS MASSIVELY ENTERTAINING, A BIT TOO DOGMATIC, BUT MOSTLY RIGHT MOST OF THE TIME
angry nord man
What?
Seeing if u r still hre
Haven't yet been unplugged.
we wuz kangz
AND WE ARE GROWING A NEW GENERATION OF "RACISTS": http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/03/denying-genetics-isnt-shutting-down-racism-its-fueling-it.html
"RACISM" DOES NOT EXIST
A WHITE GUY PREFERS TO LIVE WITH WHITE PEOPLE... AND SO WHAT?
TRUMP DID THE SAME THING HE ALWAYS DID
HE FOOLED ALL THE RIGHT WING COMMENTATORS
HE MADE A DEAL, A FAIR DEAL, WITH THE OTHER SIDE
BUT HE DEMANDED AT LEAST ONE CRUCIAL CONCESSION
THEY WOULD NOT DO IT
SO HE OVERTURNED THE WHOLE THING, RUINING THE IDEA OF THE DEAL AT ALL, AND THEN POINTED OUT, HEY, MY PLAN WORKS
Pointing out inconsistency or synchronicity between history, politics and *occult* philosophy is a mug's game. The raw data of history itself is sufficiently like a Rorschach in that one can isolate patterns to create a narrative which will then be pitted against competing narratives woven out of other isolated patterns. Ironically occult histories themselves, such as Evola's in Revolt Against the Modern World, depend on this but it seems most students of occult philosophy don't recognize the winking eye while reading and believe "hey this is what happened" even though these sorts of histories are just de rigour fiction because for whatever reason humans need grandiose stories to take anything seriously. Anyway, whether it's all complete bullshit or not, the point of occultism is to affect changes in consciousness. It can be a practicable tool in politics but the philosophy behind the pragmatic stuff is never, ever, a solid basis for managing interests for a society.
“My principles are only those that, before the French Revolution, every well-born person considered sane and normal.”
yeah that's obviously crap dude
But it's effective in getting people to hate anything humane
extraordinarily so
Which was *the point*
I DISAGREE
HE WAS SERIOUS ABOUT THE IDEA OF TRADITION
BUT THAT REQUIRES BREAKING OUT FROM THE MODERN MODEL
SAME THING NIETZSCHE WROTE ABOUT
WE MUST FIRST HAVE DIFFERENT THINKING... A DIFFERENT WAY OF VIEWING THE WORLD...
NOT SO MUCH ANTI-HUMANE AS ANTI-HUMANIST, I.E. HUMAN-CENTERED
INDIVIDUALIST EVEN
PEOPLE WHO READ EVOLA WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE PHILOSOPHICAL BACKGROUND ALWAYS COME UP WITH A BULLSHIT RELIGION