@Clonemaster™ 6.41 Thers a difference between companies having to answer to the state and tahem being completly being dismantled, i agree national socialism had aspects of marxism but its still right wing adn fascism in general was capitalistic

@Maddy will do

hell the fascist coup that nearly occured in america was organized by fucking corporations

but how is national socialism right wing

I say this as a fascist

(looks to server list on left) Holy shit, CC is gone! LOL

national fucking socialism

Even in Soviet Russia companies existed, so by that logic communism is right-wing

THE NATIONAll retard

there's no social right and left wing either, that doesn't exist

the natioal part of it

it's a distraction from what matters

Fascism and communism are gay

There was wage disparity In the ussr

Huey long is true god though

praise huey

Because communism never existed

mfw

People are different

"communism never existed"

Society structures itself around that

Can communism ever actually exist?

no

In a book

Communism can’t be realized because it exists on paper

I mean in real-life.

It can exist

HUEY LONG IS MY DAD

With two people

communism can't exist because it's a fiction

Can there ever actually be a communist society?

Communism is fiction

marx forgot this small thing called reality

Nawh that hit him hard

all evidence, 100%, proves that communism is incapable of working within reality as we know it.

communism is very real @Drakus_

You should see some of his quotes

gorillions of people starved under communism how can you say its not real

@Human Supremacist That's not very much an argument. I'm going to quote myself a little here, Nazi Germany represented a de-facto socialism, where the means of production was *technically* 'privately owned' but the state had every say in how it was run and bore the substantive powers of ownership regardless. This being the introduction of price and wage controls in 1936 as a response to the inflation caused by all the governemnt spending necessary for all its programs and subsidies. Furthermore, the government took outright control over what was produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was distrubuted. This constitutes the de-facto socialization of the economic system. The government was still excersising the powers of ownership. And the alleged position of a private owner basically became that of a government pensioner.

That's not capitalism in any way. State capitalism and socialism is literally a difference without distinction

heres a book on top of a gamepad on top of a fidget cube on top of a fidget spinner