nasa photos

@pretextos @JustARandomGuy It's an example to say this: Just because the majority believes something doesn't mean that it is true

I can also show you thousands of climate scientists made a consensus that is flat out wrong

they totally arent cgi

look at all the amazing stars

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 you have a nice voice gj

HEH

WHO

changed my BAME

go WEEB

>>mute @wojak

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **wojak**#9290

https://tenor.com/view/harry-potter-daniel-radcliffe-good-bye-bye-wave-gif-4599867
http://prntscr.com/mxrea6



@wojak

•-•

rude !!!!!

yes in 2019 camera exposure is to high tech

i am no weeb !!!

makes perfect sense

What evidence you got there @JustARandomGuy

Your name says otherwise 👀

😠

Alright, @golden legacy has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

>>>:(((

grrr

nasa cant seem to figure out how to run diff spectrums or use 2 cameras with different settings in 2019 that excuse totally still flies

I will find whoever changed my name and battle them !!!

we have time travel and AI but 2 cameras is too high tech

to thePIGPEN @wojak ..
buhbyee

yes diff light spectrums impossable

Time... travel?

I know a role just for you @JustARandomGuy

ya they announced it last week

???

tin foil rockets went to the moon guys

you can tell by the magic space tape

The camera is old thats why

1988

in 1988 cameras still had settings

lol