Message from @oh, your with her now?
Discord ID: 496245018772635648
While Fascism emphasizes strong leadership, having a cult of personality is fundamentally flawed or be it rather it is a crap shoot
Hitler and Mussolini were too eager to get their countries into wars that they were ill-prepared for
I'd argue that it was the best time to go considering Hitler's goals. Commonwealth was at its weakest point, Germany at its strongest. If anything Hitler wasn't ruthless enough.
He avoided totally mobilizing the economy for far too long, he avoided saturation bombings on urban centers for too long as well.
I read somewhere it was because he was hoping for the UK to sign a peace with them but I cant substantiate that.
I'm not fond of Hitler or his ideas of National Socialism
So I have to disagree
What are some of your contentions with Hitler and National Socialism?
I agree with Devi's assertion that he was an avatar for the volk
Hitler was an idiot when he picked a fight with the Soviet Union while fighting on two fronts against the UK and in Africa. Not very smart that.
Hitler is the reason why Fascism has such a bad name and sitgmatized as it is.
I wouldn't blame Hitler for the stigma lol, blame your guy's enemies lol
But as for the campaign in the USSR
The campaign in geographic Russia was very strong, I personally attribute the failure of Fall Blau to their defeat in the war(ironically it failed because the general staff betrayed hitlers orders and tried to brute force moscow instead of achieve the actual strategic goal)
Also National Socialism as German-centric as it is would not work in a place like the US. The US is not monolithic.
Well National Socialism in its essence was Racialist Fascism(or even Dharmic Fasicsm), it could be used as a framework for anybody.
And for the US part, I'd say thats evident of the accelerating societal decline Western countries are facing
As Spengler puts it, the `civilization phase`
It's not practical
How is it not practical? I'm not even an exponent of it but I think the world saw its practicality manifest during its armed struggle against the world.
Unless you can somehow breed the leftism out, the establishment of any ethnostate here in the US would be very costly
Are you a civnat?
or cultural nat however you want to call it
No
I mean, I think fascists primary goal should be eliminating the influence of the current hegemony
I'm saying there will be no peaceful way to establish any system
Well thats not necessarily a bad thing
There is no non violence in modernity, there is only cowardly violence, and open unashamed violence for a worthy cause
Also the concept is not inherently universal, although it can be
But in practice every nation has its own issues
Which is why I aim to "Americanize" the European model to some degree that is congruent with the culture of a more pragmatic America before it became a bastardized poster modernist fantasy
The variant of Fascism I subscribe to is Integralism
National Integralism
America before it became bastardized was a white state by white people for white people
More or less although I believe there are groups of non-whites that pretty much earned their right to be here
So are you saying that you can take someone who has merit and is an asset to society (being an engineer or a doctor) and just shove them aside because they're a different skin color? That's not very pragmatic and you're throwing away talent.
As few as they are.
Race mixing unironically hurts everybody
So any financial benefit you get from having other people is automatically negated in the long run
This is supported by regression toward the mean, for example