Not Wikipedia

eh, i 'm not gonna spoon feed you

@YouRYou gravity is just a theory

Theres no scientific method to prove its real

I already know, genius. You're the one who needs to be spoonfed, idiot.

Oh i know it better than you

YouRYou srsly look more into things before debating

@Citizen Z so crepuscular rays don't point back to the sun?

@YouRYou See? Your own globies tell you you're wrong.

Go learn something before you further embarrass yourself.

How do you triangulate in your model if the stars are apparent positions

the error is the same for all viewing locations

Lol

Funny.

No answer.

<:globiegoggles:485140915149864980>

<:giggle:485714802123997184>

<:fakenews:507995495982170112>

can't read?

if you think the atmosphere distorts things that much, then it could make things appear in the distance above the curve

your logic

He doesn't even know what the scientific method is. He can't prove the globe to himself, let alone anyone else.

The error can't be the same as you would have to measure the atmosphere

@Polar is clearly the smartest among you, he realises grabbity is a theory

it was photographed from up high in 1947, easy

To confirm that

@YouRYou goto #civil debate

<#538929818834698260>

But then again, in the flat earth model, the sun and moons movement is just a theory and the fact that we have a dome over our heads is a theory, (some flat earthers dont think that) and how the earth was created is just a theory

You are clogging the chat

Oh ok

Both sides have theories in them

@Polar no evidence for a dome too

Well here I am

flat earth is a hypothesis

So is the globe

with evidence

To be honest it all comes down to what model has more proven facts and less theories to base things on