@Citizen Z And what about the sun which is 4000 miles above the surface

it's not sliding across the ground

@Citizen Z angular resoltion is not teh angle between one object and another

@Citizen Z atmospheric lensing

yep that's true

but as something gets far away it disappears all together, not bottom up

what if it went up away from you into the sky

would the bottom disappear first?

right

the object will no longer be discernable

wouldn't that make it disappear later? if it was closer?

sso closer means it disappears first

how

that's not the right angle when talking about angular resolution

that's the angle of view, not angle for angular resolution

angular resolution is the arc length of the object in the field of view

i'd still be able to see the bottom no matter how far

until the object itself disappears

this is a top view anyway

Says top view right there

shows that light from the bottom of the object would always hit my eye

ok

what if the object is equally above and below my eye level

does bottom still disappear first? because angle to the top of the object would be the same

that would happen to every part of the object simultaneously, not the bottom

how is it further

it's teh same distance away

the top

but what if you eye level is in the middle of the object, like a boat

Besides, how would something being further away make it easier to see

What angle

You're using the wrong angle

angular size is something else

Ya that's using the wrong angle

Angular size is how much the object takes up

not the angle between two lines

AGain, you're using the wrong angle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_diameter#/media/File:Angular_diameter.jpg

what is the science for a flat earth

@Human Sheeple al biruni and eratosthenes confirmed radius

@Polar lol watch what they come back with

you'll get a good chuckle

Horizon drops with altitude

Thus round

@Seeker of Truth how do you know that, have you been to either?

where's the scientific experiment proving the sun and moon are in a give and take

@Human Sheeple objects would fall even in the pool

they wouldn't float around like that

impossible to get something neutrally buoyant, that's an unstable system

@Seeker of Truth is there any scientific experiment proving teh sun is a positive charge

@Seeker of Truth Sun would never set in that situation

and spontaneously change speeds

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 i have answers for all those

I do

LOL what?

I do

lol wrong

i'll give you mine after you go ahead and give me what i asked for first

I don't think you do

if you're making claims about the position of the Sun and Moon

where is proof of that?

I responded toa claim here, didn't make any of my own

is there any scientific experiment proving teh sun is a positive charge

I was having a conversation with someone that brought that up

I"d lke to know the proof of that

Those are literally proven, all of them

But i'm curious what proof you guys hvae

For your wild claim

Nah those have already been explained to you sorry

@Seeker of Truth what would be proof of it

how could that be proven though

I wanna see how you think it would be provne, b/c by your logic there is no electric charge force either

The distance to the SUn was best measured by the venus transit

Ya it is, it's been triangulated

those are all proven

measured

no you're wrong

you are 100% wrong

by your logic nothing you calim to be true is proven

measuring somethign with triangulaion is scientific

you want me to type out the whole thing?

eh, i 'm not gonna spoon feed you

Oh i know it better than you

@Citizen Z so crepuscular rays don't point back to the sun?

the error is the same for all viewing locations

can't read?

if you think the atmosphere distorts things that much, then it could make things appear in the distance above the curve

your logic

it was photographed from up high in 1947, easy

@Polar no evidence for a dome too

flat earth is a hypothesis

with evidence

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 photos from up high, direct evidence

horizon drop with altitude, direct measurement

now you'll call them fake

predictable

where are pictures of flat earth from up high?

is that field of view wide enough to show the curve?

ok what about this one'