>never said I believed in them
>hasn't said anything about my beliefs
>hasn't quoted anything because you haven't

yet you still criticize my beliefs I haven't stated

And my sources I haven't cited

its a rocket with fish eye

@Michael J Smith pretends to be a mechanical engineer

big deal

old

It's not a fish eye. All you have to do is look at the shape of the rocket to know that it's not a fish eye/

I mean if we're saying being old makes something wrong than the flat earth theory is pretty old kek

If it were a fish eye, the shape of objects woudl change between middle and edge of frame

reality vs your head

is all it is

Oh god NASA is coming, they're trying to shove their """""space bandaids" up my backside oh no

Uses satelite imagery, claims satellites aren't real

classic

oh wait I'm a NASAsexual

I should still be able to see the flat earth even if it were a fish eye. I'd still be able to see the edge

@noah You base this on.... what, exactly?

he seen all the cartoons nas aprovided him

Presumptions on how a flat earth would look and work?

duh

satellites are on high-altitude balloons
outer space has been faked
you have been deceived

There is no reason that the light wouldn't be transmitted from the edge of the flat earth to the camera

ya seeker

There is nothing blocking the path of the light

remember the google free internet stattlites

@noah So presumptions

Got it

that crashed with balloons

LUL

What presumptions?

The sad thing is most people cannot tell the difference between what is real and what is computer graphics...

50$ says amazon will crasha balloon sat as well

cause they exist

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHBxxnuXTJ4

theres the google free net project

from a couple years ago

@Seeker of Truth Where's the proof that they're on balloons