makes sense.

Common ground

👍

mhm

<:GWsiraMeguThumbsUp:398886147196977153>

Uuhh what did I miss

nothing

sorry for the misunderstanding

actually, everything

Makes scene

ive noticed that “trolling” is kind of a gray area like you can get muted for something that is purely a joke

mhm

sadly

@Noodles I simply take the stance that since amature astronomers can only use telescopes to see other planets, we can't exactly tell what they are, definitively.

Stay flat stay safe seeker

Please

Stay flat stay safe

If there comes a time when anyone can have the means to either go there or have better ways of testing, then I'd be all for it.

what of the spacecrafts like voyager I?

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Hey I would like to know why the force explained in the article you sent me happens, never told me why it did

oof

<a:wobble:529512789577039893>

@LoL You're right. I disagree with the stance of that article that claims absolution. I simply would like to add a substitution for gravity since there is no cause, yet. Once we have a cause, we can put that debate to rest. Until someone comes along and retests. Since science is never settled.

@zenuion That's a craft that was allegedly sent into space. The issue is, no one can verify that it actually did. And we can only take digital data from the organization that sent it up. I cannot accept something I cannot verify.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 Ok well anyways, I have a question about why the government would hide all this from because I would be really mad at them for why they would do this

well the thing is its one of those natural phenomenon that just happens and we dont have the technology to do so we have theory but only very few kind of work

That's the issue, though. @eletrick33

People are claiming it as absolute

i mean just because you dont know how something works doesnt mean it isnt real

Doesn't mean you know that to be the cause, either.

You can slap a different name on it and you'd still have the same theory.

I could just as well say the aether damps acceleration, so an infinitely dense object dropped in an infitesimally not dense medium will TOP OUT at -9.81 m/s^2 because of the aether.

do you lot actually believe the earth is flat?

@LoL I would rather stick to evidence. Motive is subjective and irrelevant.
If a detective finds a dead body and a bloody fingerprint, he needs no motive. He needs to follow the evidence.

isnt aether pseudoscience meaning fake science

whats the most convincing bit of evidence that makes you lot think the earth is flat

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 So you're trying to dismiss it? That weakens your point kinda due to that "Motive is subjective and irrelevant" If you can just give me a reason why they would hide it for what? To not have to change our beliefs?

@LoL It doesn't weaken anything. You don't need motive for a single thing in existence.

@shane Try to make the globe support itself with scientific method experiments. If you can find some, please present them because we have tried looking.

I'm genuinley just asking, dont know any facts for either side, just seeing everyones opinions cause its interesting to me.

Who’s ready for hitler day tomorrow?