it's not my kind of game but i have to agree with you

I don't know why people did that : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI7EsNJoAdw

Do no fog tests?

yeah

especially when the whole map isn't rendered

K

Looks naked for a silent hill game

Im assuming just to see

How it looks

And where the borders are in the game

^ Same as my playthroughs o games without textures.

It's fun to see games get picked apart.

True

It's like disecting a dead body to see how the body works when they teach students of biology / health.

Or sometimes it just makes the game run better on the computer.

well, you don't really need to to that to know the limitations of the game considering the console it was developed for

300MHz CPU with 32MB ram and a GPU of 150Mhz...

that's the specs of the PS2

To know the extent you do

well I was still young at that time and I didn't really know much about game design but I already expected such thing

I was 14 when SH2 was release

I remember when I first seen Silent Hill 3 on the back of the MGS2 manual. I was in awe with the rustic look.

First time I ever heard of Silent Hill.

Little did I know it would someday become one of my favorite series.

It was on the back of themanual in the Substance version.

oh, yeah, substance ^^"

I was about to say

first release of MGS2 is older than SH2

I wouldn't expect SH3 advertisment in that

^ First release is 2001. xD That release is 2003.

MGS2 is 2001, SH2 is 2001 😉

oh my bad, silent hill 2 is a month older than MGS2

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/107042-Silent-Hill-Artist-Claims-Konami-Disbanded-Team-Silent

konami and their fucked up...

@Sexy Zombie Roo I don't know how you play games without textures

It freaks the fuck out of me

Idk my graphic standards are kinda low

I don't care a lot about graphics, especially on old stuff

I think MGS2 is a spectacular looking game

but on a new console, that shit is fugly

MGS2 is nothing special compared to MGS3