Message from @Lawrence of Eurabia
Discord ID: 519732060982738964
Very old image from my early AR days
Well for something like a fertility goddess that is a go to attribute to deify
The european pagans got more specific
Varg pointed out some interesting stuff with the "Bear Cult" that Neanderthals worshipped, where the tradition of removing the skull and thighbone from the grave of an ancestor was practiced by the Germans and Celts until Christianity came. There are Neanderthal Graves missing the skulls and thighbones.
Varg is also an atheist
In a sense yes
No like hes said he doesnt believe in God before
From a Christian perspective I guess
He even uses the sky daddy meme
You dont get more atheistic than saying "I dont believe in god"
No matter the perspective
And atheism is fucking retarded
Deism and theism are the only logical conclusions
That's a Christian way of seeing things I guess. I'll try to find a chart that explains some of this stuff
Its not a christian way
If you dont believe in a god, gods, or higher power you're an atheist
Evola is an atheist then. Cause he saw Gods and God as human creations
He was spiritual
There's a distinct difference there
yes, but he didn't believe in a higher power. Varg is also spiritual, but barely
Some guy I know made this
he's autistic so
There you go
Atheism and agnosticism are just retarded
I've never put to much thought into it
It shows an incredible lack of basic philosophical and theological knowledge if youre an atheist or agnostic
I guess, I don't think it really matters to much. Some nigger can be a devout Christian or Muslim, but in the end their biology matters more than what they think
Don’t agnostics basically say “idk, we can’t empirically figure this shit out”
Like the radical centrist of religion
"I took 6th grade science, so I believe in evolution and God isn't real. Yeah I'm cool."
Isn’t that atheist
That sounds like neckbeard tier atheism
That's basically most atheism
Agnosticism is also dumb because trying there are things we know that are true that we cannot empirically deduce
Such as 2+2=4
You cannot empirically prove that 2+2=4 but you can logically prove 2+2=4
imagine believing in some skynigga
the only thing i can be sure of is the cool refreshing taste of Coca Cola
<:GWsetmyxPeepoWeird:405337568155009024>
>implying coca cola isnt the sky nigga