DDOS link

@beyond_gravity if walls work how come Laura loomer was able to jump pelosi’s fence

That’s a fence

We talking about walls

If there’s a wall, dig a tunnel

@Children.Deserve.Cancer.REBORN

Don’t @ me

If they use a ladder or a tunnel use a bullet.

Breaking laws should have consequences.

Not everybody thinks the world is entitled to our shit.

Okay

Ask yourselves: Am I going to spend my life on this earth Building things, or Destroying them?

You can generally do only one or the other, on an individual level. So go ahead and create new, special things; inventions, designs, business plans, a wonderful book, for a few examples.... Or, spend your time exposing the deceit and corruption and **HYPOCRISY** around you, but it will keep you from ***building anything better*** yourself.

The politics of my country are filled with people of both types and they seem to hate each other. Conservatives are usually more concerned with the physical exigencies of life, such as gold, silver, property, currency, etc. The stuff they value is generally tangible. The Liberals are more focused on the interpersonal relationships in their lives and making a positive change to the world. So which of them is doing it all wrong?

***BOTH OF THEM ARE. AND NEITHER ARE***

These two personality types (Builders and Healers, perhaps) are important to ANY successful Republic or Democracy. There are other types, like Maintainers, but they are either a subset of these two or wholly dependent on them.

Without the Liberals/Healers (and the personality types involved), the wage gap between the rich and the poor widens, poor people tend to stay poor, while rich people are exclusionary and the result is the average person suffers. Black markets thrive as evil people in high places take advantage of those less fortunate than them. Perhaps the richest would create walled off neighborhoods with private security forces to keep the poor out... It would be ugly.

Without the Conservatives/Builders, the monetary systems of the world would collapse, along with the infrastructure of industry. New cars would no longer be produced and groceries would quickly be replaced with Farmer's Markets, which can subsist with less infrastructure. Many would lose track of how much money they owed. They might lose power in the middle of something important and realize no one was keeping the power station running. They would delegate and elect groups to solve each issue, but no amount of sub-committees would be enough to affect any meaningful change. If it did not, it would likely be due to conservative personalities inside families of the other type who would save it.

The two-party system was not always this homogenized or polarized. Will we have to kill each other on the battlefield before we come together again? Only time will tell. But ***you*** are responsible for the result, just as I am. So let's try to fix this by working together with our opposite numbers.

-OYD

Okay

you're saying we should have a independent party?

Nice essay ese

**ese**

I'm not smart enough to come up with anything better. I'm just sharing the perspective from where I'm sitting...

It’s obvious that you’re not smart. No need for you to share that with us

Lol

Shush

Always in the right, I swear

Yes

ISRAEL GOOD

yes

kind of

Ok why do you say kind of?

Israel good

Lol

This lad is hilarious

xd

Oh Casper I get to you,later lol

I like the policy Israel has for defending itself

Israel doesn't defend itself

with american dollars

Yes t does

With American dollars sure, but it’s selfish in america, they don’t ask for troops, just supplies

It’s on purely selfish reasons alone but that isn’t bad

Ever since the inception of the state, it's been surrounded by continuous warfare, Israel is the catalyst of that warfare and without it the state would kinda fall apart.

There are American troops stationed in Israel wtf