Message from @tinfoilhatman
Discord ID: 546518676770390037
No not really.
More like monarchism with democratic aspects.
Yes, with all the parliament in such
Exactly
Not true monarchism
again monarchism with democratic aspects.
still monarchism at its core
Then in that case, name one monarchy before the 1700’s that saw a flourishing population
I would have to say the HRE would be flourishing.
as well as Poland Lithuania
France as well
the byzantine empire could count
the Roman empire too
The HRE, well in that case I stand corrected, but France is definitely not a contender for flourishing peoples
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!
depends more or less
maybe for the low low class but middle class flourished.
As for the Roman, that was not Monarchism
to an extent
Not by a long shot
It was ruled by a senate and emperor, neither of which is monarchism, the emperor would always consult the senate for political decisions
had monarchist ideals
but doesnt matter debating this considering the HRE is flourishing.
The HRE definitely did flourish, i cant and wont deny that
I won't deny that germany did flourish during the 1940s
but only at the cost of individualism freedom and the cost of innocent lives
In the end, neither of the ideologies exist in their truest form anymore
with all that I wouldnt say it was a great place to live.
Unless you were aryan
well even then
Hitler was a good man.
change my mind.
aryans didnt exactly have the best life either
He was a good man
Well no, but only because of prosecution and war from foreign countries
No
the state sacrificed their freedom to put them in factories in order to produce stuff for the populace
<:kek:538084230408830987>
whether that was food or military supplies
Not really though, that was more so seen under communism in russia and china
Which i think we can both agree communism is much worse than anything else