Message from @tinfoilhatman

Discord ID: 546519504604102676


2019-02-17 02:28:21 UTC  

France as well

2019-02-17 02:28:46 UTC  

the byzantine empire could count

2019-02-17 02:28:50 UTC  

the Roman empire too

2019-02-17 02:29:16 UTC  

The HRE, well in that case I stand corrected, but France is definitely not a contender for flourishing peoples

2019-02-17 02:29:16 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-02-17 02:29:28 UTC  

depends more or less

2019-02-17 02:29:37 UTC  

maybe for the low low class but middle class flourished.

2019-02-17 02:29:42 UTC  

As for the Roman, that was not Monarchism

2019-02-17 02:29:54 UTC  

to an extent

2019-02-17 02:29:59 UTC  

Not by a long shot

2019-02-17 02:30:06 UTC  

it went back and forth

2019-02-17 02:30:53 UTC  

It was ruled by a senate and emperor, neither of which is monarchism, the emperor would always consult the senate for political decisions

2019-02-17 02:31:08 UTC  

had monarchist ideals

2019-02-17 02:31:21 UTC  

but doesnt matter debating this considering the HRE is flourishing.

2019-02-17 02:31:41 UTC  

The HRE definitely did flourish, i cant and wont deny that

2019-02-17 02:32:05 UTC  

I won't deny that germany did flourish during the 1940s

2019-02-17 02:32:30 UTC  

but only at the cost of individualism freedom and the cost of innocent lives

2019-02-17 02:32:50 UTC  

In the end, neither of the ideologies exist in their truest form anymore

2019-02-17 02:32:54 UTC  

with all that I wouldnt say it was a great place to live.

2019-02-17 02:33:11 UTC  

Unless you were aryan

2019-02-17 02:33:23 UTC  

well even then

2019-02-17 02:33:34 UTC  

Hitler was a good man.
change my mind.

2019-02-17 02:33:35 UTC  

aryans didnt exactly have the best life either

2019-02-17 02:33:44 UTC  

He was a good man

2019-02-17 02:34:10 UTC  

Well no, but only because of prosecution and war from foreign countries

2019-02-17 02:34:20 UTC  

No

2019-02-17 02:34:42 UTC  

the state sacrificed their freedom to put them in factories in order to produce stuff for the populace

2019-02-17 02:34:43 UTC  

<:kek:538084230408830987>

2019-02-17 02:34:52 UTC  

whether that was food or military supplies

2019-02-17 02:35:22 UTC  

Not really though, that was more so seen under communism in russia and china

2019-02-17 02:35:43 UTC  

Which i think we can both agree communism is much worse than anything else

2019-02-17 02:35:49 UTC  

in order for any nation to flourish they needed workers to make produce.

2019-02-17 02:35:50 UTC  

GG @tinfoilhatman, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-02-17 02:35:50 UTC  

yup

2019-02-17 02:35:53 UTC  

sure it is

2019-02-17 02:35:57 UTC  

communism bad

2019-02-17 02:37:05 UTC  

In Germany, the workers worked on their own accord, they got stuff done because they were determined and passionate about their country and its goals

2019-02-17 02:37:21 UTC  

no country will ever live purely off of nationalism.

2019-02-17 02:37:38 UTC  

as much as I would love that, and I would, it just wont happen.

2019-02-17 02:37:55 UTC  

Maybe not anymore because of an overwhelming dependence on materialistic ideals

2019-02-17 02:38:42 UTC  

Which is very sad seeing as Nationalism is one of the greatest ways to Unite the people of a single country