Message from @tinfoilhatman

Discord ID: 546518137600868379


2019-02-17 02:23:04 UTC  

It caused suffering for those who deserved it, not everyone like monarchism did

2019-02-17 02:23:40 UTC  

I think that's something called scape goating a specific group of people in order to propel your political ideology

2019-02-17 02:23:58 UTC  

suffering for a specific group of people is still suffering.

2019-02-17 02:24:17 UTC  

suffering is suffering no matter if someone "deserved" it

2019-02-17 02:24:32 UTC  

It fixed all the problems created by that group and ideologies associated with that group, but again it didn’t force everyone to suffer, which monarchism did do

2019-02-17 02:24:59 UTC  

monarchism didnt cause everyone go suffer that's a very broad statement.

2019-02-17 02:24:59 UTC  

GG @tinfoilhatman, you just advanced to level 1!

2019-02-17 02:25:05 UTC  

to*

2019-02-17 02:25:16 UTC  

So then when did people flourish under monarchism

2019-02-17 02:25:23 UTC  

and it fixed problems by causing force labor among innocent peoples.

2019-02-17 02:25:39 UTC  

towards the early 1900s and late 1800s.

2019-02-17 02:26:04 UTC  

Me and you both know that isnt monarchism, it was damn near democracy

2019-02-17 02:26:13 UTC  

No not really.

2019-02-17 02:26:23 UTC  

More like monarchism with democratic aspects.

2019-02-17 02:26:25 UTC  

Yes, with all the parliament in such

2019-02-17 02:26:30 UTC  

Exactly

2019-02-17 02:26:35 UTC  

Not true monarchism

2019-02-17 02:26:36 UTC  

again monarchism with democratic aspects.

2019-02-17 02:26:46 UTC  

still monarchism at its core

2019-02-17 02:27:33 UTC  

Then in that case, name one monarchy before the 1700’s that saw a flourishing population

2019-02-17 02:27:57 UTC  

I would have to say the HRE would be flourishing.

2019-02-17 02:28:13 UTC  

as well as Poland Lithuania

2019-02-17 02:28:21 UTC  

France as well

2019-02-17 02:28:46 UTC  

the byzantine empire could count

2019-02-17 02:28:50 UTC  

the Roman empire too

2019-02-17 02:29:16 UTC  

The HRE, well in that case I stand corrected, but France is definitely not a contender for flourishing peoples

2019-02-17 02:29:16 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-02-17 02:29:28 UTC  

depends more or less

2019-02-17 02:29:37 UTC  

maybe for the low low class but middle class flourished.

2019-02-17 02:29:42 UTC  

As for the Roman, that was not Monarchism

2019-02-17 02:29:54 UTC  

to an extent

2019-02-17 02:29:59 UTC  

Not by a long shot

2019-02-17 02:30:06 UTC  

it went back and forth

2019-02-17 02:30:53 UTC  

It was ruled by a senate and emperor, neither of which is monarchism, the emperor would always consult the senate for political decisions

2019-02-17 02:31:08 UTC  

had monarchist ideals

2019-02-17 02:31:21 UTC  

but doesnt matter debating this considering the HRE is flourishing.

2019-02-17 02:31:41 UTC  

The HRE definitely did flourish, i cant and wont deny that

2019-02-17 02:32:05 UTC  

I won't deny that germany did flourish during the 1940s

2019-02-17 02:32:30 UTC  

but only at the cost of individualism freedom and the cost of innocent lives

2019-02-17 02:32:50 UTC  

In the end, neither of the ideologies exist in their truest form anymore

2019-02-17 02:32:54 UTC  

with all that I wouldnt say it was a great place to live.