Message from @Throttles
Discord ID: 637764839967555615
creating a false narrative out of sloppily compiled info is not “consensus”
Ya, consensus is consensus.
Dumbass.
science is not a consensus, but whatever
a consensus proves nothing, that's a logical fallacy
you morons
it used to be that the consensus was the Earth was the center of our "solar system"
and that it was flat
Except in this case consensus isn't based on some scientifically unsupported religious mumbo-jumbo. This time the consensus is based on years of research and data that a very specific breed of morons simply cannot accept, because it goes against their fundamentally erroneous views of how this planet works.
Case in point, the golden moron above.
It's also a subject of scientific consensus that your brain is flat, qwasi. <:peepok:583236153852035072>
"Science is the best idea humans have ever had. The more people who embrace that idea, the better." - Mike Tyson
@qwasi what’s your rebuttal to that qwasi
He has no rebuttals.
Just random shit he types whenever he's caught in order to pretend that he's "trolling".
Little qwasi is big dumb
Argumentum ad populum is a informal fallacy
Meaning it focuses on the content
Not the structure of the argument
And a formal fallacy is a logical fallacy.
it may not be a logical fallacy, but it still doesn't prove anything
that was my point
It does when it's based on empirical data that's been gathered over many years by experts in the field.
Attacking the consensus without disproving what the consensus is around, naturally, is absolutely moronic.
It supports the argument that the contrary is more improbable, as experts in the field who study it are in support. @qwasi
yes
i get that
Also deductive vs inductive reasoning. One is better than the other but not possible in many cases
I'm skeptical of the 97% consensus, that's all I'm saying
Because 49 ex-workers for NASA wrote a letter.
No
<:peepok:583236153852035072>
What's it like being so arrogant that you're convinced you can read someone's mind over the internet?
I didn't read your mind. I wrote what you typed.
And that's what you typed.
and you're a retard
?
You've nothing to say back and you go to your primitive nature through animalistic insults.