Not everything is the left's fault, you mongrel.

@qwasi = retard conspiracy theorist

You have to be, to oppose scientific consensus. You have to believe that they are all lying for some reason. It's insanity.

creating a false narrative out of sloppily compiled info is not “consensus”

Ya, consensus is consensus.

Dumbass.

science is not a consensus, but whatever

a consensus proves nothing, that's a logical fallacy

you morons

it used to be that the consensus was the Earth was the center of our "solar system"

and that it was flat

Except in this case consensus isn't based on some scientifically unsupported religious mumbo-jumbo. This time the consensus is based on years of research and data that a very specific breed of morons simply cannot accept, because it goes against their fundamentally erroneous views of how this planet works.

Case in point, the golden moron above.

It's also a subject of scientific consensus that your brain is flat, qwasi. <:peepok:583236153852035072>

"Science is the best idea humans have ever had. The more people who embrace that idea, the better." - Mike Tyson

@qwasi what’s your rebuttal to that qwasi

He has no rebuttals.

Just random shit he types whenever he's caught in order to pretend that he's "trolling".

Little qwasi is big dumb

@qwasi consensus is not a logical fallacy

Argumentum ad populum is a informal fallacy

Meaning it focuses on the content

Not the structure of the argument

That would be a formal fallacy

And a formal fallacy is a logical fallacy.

it may not be a logical fallacy, but it still doesn't prove anything

that was my point

It does when it's based on empirical data that's been gathered over many years by experts in the field.

Attacking the consensus without disproving what the consensus is around, naturally, is absolutely moronic.

It supports the argument that the contrary is more improbable, as experts in the field who study it are in support. @qwasi

yes

i get that

Also deductive vs inductive reasoning. One is better than the other but not possible in many cases

I'm skeptical of the 97% consensus, that's all I'm saying

Because 49 ex-workers for NASA wrote a letter.

No

<:peepok:583236153852035072>

What's it like being so arrogant that you're convinced you can read someone's mind over the internet?

I didn't read your mind. I wrote what you typed.

And that's what you typed.