Message from @Platinum Spark

Discord ID: 631130903464247297


2019-10-08 14:06:22 UTC  

What I just sent was from the summary

2019-10-08 14:06:44 UTC  

Yeah no Sophie's lying.

2019-10-08 14:06:59 UTC  

Cobra I literally copied what you posted

2019-10-08 14:07:17 UTC  

So without any evidence

2019-10-08 14:07:26 UTC  

Are you saying that was schiff's parody or from trump's transcript?

2019-10-08 14:07:35 UTC  

Trump says you should look into why they investigation was stopped- let’s even take your word on it

2019-10-08 14:07:51 UTC  

Yep, that's not illegal.

2019-10-08 14:07:55 UTC  

Like one of those quotes it literally from Schiff not the transcript and if you reference the summary of the transcript it’s quite different in content

2019-10-08 14:07:55 UTC  

That is the same as asking him to investigate the Bidens

2019-10-08 14:07:56 UTC  

Context is key.

2019-10-08 14:08:06 UTC  

Wow no it isn't?

2019-10-08 14:08:10 UTC  

@fuck12moredeadcops you mean the first quote? What are you talking about

2019-10-08 14:08:26 UTC  

The first quote you posted yeah

2019-10-08 14:08:36 UTC  

@Cobra Commander “why did you stop the investigation” is the same thing

2019-10-08 14:08:37 UTC  

That’s not from the summary of the transcript, that’s Schiff’s paraphrasing

2019-10-08 14:08:45 UTC  

@fuck12moredeadcops yes, I know... what’s your point?

2019-10-08 14:08:50 UTC  

The first one yes

2019-10-08 14:08:50 UTC  

And even CNN admits he’s mischaracterizing the contents of the transcript

2019-10-08 14:08:53 UTC  

The second one no

2019-10-08 14:09:00 UTC  

Context is key. Exactly the problem for POTUS. This is a guy who whitewashes crimes of MBS and Putin and Kim

2019-10-08 14:09:27 UTC  

The second quote, which is the actual quote from the summary doesn’t mean much though

2019-10-08 14:09:42 UTC  

Yes, it does we are currently talking about it

2019-10-08 14:09:53 UTC  

Are you caught up vibe?

2019-10-08 14:10:20 UTC  

Moving on- so cobra, when you end an investigation, it’s because you brought an investigation to its conclusion

2019-10-08 14:10:44 UTC  

Literally what criminal indictment can be made off of the statement “so if you can look into it”

2019-10-08 14:10:46 UTC  

No it isn't in the slightest. First of all, there is nothing wrong with Trump wanting to investigate Biden's son, *he* is not a political candidate. And even then he didn't actually say to look into Hunter Biden specifically, let alone Joe Biden. He said to investigate why a prosecution was stopped in the Ukraine.

2019-10-08 14:11:07 UTC  

If you call someone up and say “look into why the investigation ended” (though that is a charitable interpretation) then you’re suggesting impropriety

2019-10-08 14:11:18 UTC  

None Vibe, you have to be very partisan to make that stretch <:laugh:583238348077006869>

2019-10-08 14:11:33 UTC  

There absolutely is something wrong with calling up a foreign leader and, WITH NO EVIDENCE, suggesting they investigate an American citizen

2019-10-08 14:11:41 UTC  

It is a massive abuse of office

2019-10-08 14:11:54 UTC  

Evidence as in a prosecution being stopped, hey this is kind of fishy?

2019-10-08 14:11:55 UTC  

And I would remind Vibe that impeachment requires no criminal statute violation

2019-10-08 14:12:11 UTC  

If it were based on any evidence then maybe

2019-10-08 14:12:23 UTC  

That's... evidence lol.

2019-10-08 14:12:29 UTC  

But it isn’t, and he mentions no one else, just the family of his political opponent

2019-10-08 14:12:31 UTC  

What’s evidence

2019-10-08 14:12:45 UTC  

He could be wrong about there being something there but that is absolutely cause to be suspicious.

2019-10-08 14:12:46 UTC  

The end of an investigation is evidence of wrongdoing?

2019-10-08 14:12:52 UTC  

What is suspicious?