Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 631505579587928075
WE are arguing about VOTER FRAUD
RETARD
Fuck off nazi, no one is talking to you
They’re just as corrupt as any republican, they engage in the same behavior
But you just were
xd
No, that’s simply not true
When it comes to limiting the franchise, that is a republican behavior
*Imagine calling a nazi a nazi to offend them*
And if you look at the top contributors to money in politics
The republicans are the ones advancing their interests
So is it a problem on both sides? Yes
Is it an *equal* problem? Not even close
Democrats dont take money from Unions at all
XD
@Deleted User I’m not trying to offend you, I’m telling you to fuck off
You were the one responding retard
@Deleted User now I’m blocking you, you nazi piece of shit
Fox news is opinion and propaganda
awwww
Accurate
Its okay you degenerates and the people you follow will meet the rope god willing
Yeah Republicans are more likely to take corporate money and do it on a larger scale, but Democrats aren’t ideologically or fundamentally opposed to capital. Their plan is, as it’s always been, is to minimize the destructive consequences of capitalism to maintain it into the future. Like FDR said his greatest accomplishment was saving capitlaism, and Democrats are just as invested in this maintenance of a corporate status quo
@TheNobody Is it cool if someone just threatens violence in this server?
...right, but if we’re outside of a fun fantasy land
The fun fantasyland of actual opposition to capitlaism?
I think that’s an unrealistic view of the way politics works in general
“The plan is, as it has always been”
Suggests some sort of cabal running things
The parties aren’t just shadowy organizations, they’re dynamic blocs
Yeah sure it’s not some organized and conscious effort, as much as it’s just a consequence of the political trajectory of liberalism. It’s the result of the political framework they’ve put themselves in. They’re wholly incapable of challenging the fundamental assumptions of capitalism, and as a result they seek its maintenance necessarily.
Then can you do something about Rockwell suggesting we get hung? @TheNobody
I don’t think that’s accurate
I mean look at Warren and Sanders
You don’t think they are a positive step?
Or are you just an anti-incrementalism so you think we should burn it all down
@fuck12moredeadcops sernd ss
I think it’s a positive step, and ideally one of them becomes the Democratic Candidate, but they’re not suggesting fundamental changes, just compromises, and when the UN scientist are telling us even if we were to meet our current emissions reduction goals (which we aren’t), we’re going to have catastrophic changes to our food production output, an answer outside of compromise is necessary
Yes, I agree with most of that, what kind of fundamental changes do you think are necessary?