thermodynamics compared with topographical biology, we know how much it 'costs' to farm x amount of land and what amount of productivity

I think there’s a fallacy there that the population was at max capacity prior to gasoline

I don’t think there’s evidence to support that

No we weren't at it

that's not what im saying

How tf a research nigga gon predict shit

I'm saying that's about what it would be if we had to exist without it, sustainably

Why is this on Trump

How are you estimating that

Don’t know if theirs lands we haven’t discovered

Uht uht

...there is not land on earth we have not discovered

You don’t know that

Yeah

Explored yes, discovered no

I do know that

There's no more land to be discovered

GG @Svea Rike, you just advanced to level 6!

short versions there http://www.skil.org//position_papers_folder/TourlectureSKILconcepts.html

There’s possible chances that there is lands we haven’t discovered

No we've got it all

No, we have satellite imaging

Nah

Never know

@Sh0t this is nothing, where’s his models

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 11!

Satellites do know

well no we do know, there is no place on earth that hasn't been mapped because the satellites have orbited the entire planet

I’m fairly sure he’s just trolling

I recommend blocking and moving on with your life

Yea

it would be *neat* if there was undiscovered land but yeah no we know it all

Nah I’m dead serious

I prefer not to block people

Why block me

I’m just saying

There could be a possible chance

@crypto then answer the criticism of your point

There's no chance we have mapped it all

You’re saying satellite

Again, because of satellites, it is not possible that there is land we have missed