Message from @Sh0t
Discord ID: 654613076598980608
I'm not even sure what point you're trying to prove
that government is complex?
I mean...
I would never tell myself to stfu
After all I am shot
Fuck yummy add
you said "equilibrium we passed", etc, the very idea such a thing existed/exists is part of the problem
Fuck my ass *
Stupid autocorrect
'complex' in this case does not mean complicated or 'having many parts'
so are you arguing we should give the government unlimited power?
That's also not what it means
is that what you're saying?
if it's not, then there is some "imaginary line" where the people have a certain amount of power and the government has a certain amount, that we should strive to find and uphold
and giving the government more power than it needs to do what we want it to is a terrible idea
there is no line to cross. the systems we design have to be adaptive
that metaphor is broken
yes adapt, wow so intellectual
a line that moves then
is that better
the people can have way more rights and privacy than they have now AND the government can get more done, they are not necessarily in conflict
i disagree
but in general, those framings of the issue are all bad, which is part of the point of their book
I think the more power you give government the more it will be abused
it is the nature of power
Are u actually retarded?
Fucking hell
nature of power for an individual and a system are going to be very different, that's the scale issue mentioned above
and the IC has far too much power when it relates to American citizens
anyone that can read that list of 17 abuses and excuse them as "clerical" is not an honest person
occassionally, it has far too little, or it takes too long to get what they need, or not enough money is spent, or spent on the wrong technologies or processes, etc. I like to focus on the oversight scenarios, because there is no easy way to codify it
17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions”
right
dishonest
Individuals can have their heart in the right place and make all kinds of mistakes than can be interpreteted as intentional abuse
How's Trump reacting to the Articles that were drafted?
sometimes real ABUSE can be perfectly executed, legally speaking
unless it helped Trump, then you'd be screaming for their heads
you keep saying that, but it's not true. this issue is much bigger than Trump
and far older
I saw the site, Sh0t. It is pretty decent.