That’s the furthest I got
It is a functional scale if you got the refrence
lol
Crime is crime because part of the crime is crime
Yup
It’s just repeating itself
ravings of absolute madman
That’s not even thesiable with the proper understanding of common English
yeah
he doesn't have a good grasp of english
but he's pretending he's a native speaker for some reason
You’re just stating the physical features mutilating with more of the same
Trump is trump because part of trump is trump
The laws (multiple) is law (single), because part of law (part) is law (single)
You just repeat it 4 times
it is a functional conversion comparison
4 is 4 because part of 4 is 4
my money is still on this being a David Wynn Miller con victim
You just repeat it
But there is just the amount that matters
OMG let me double down on confederate Texan
You just repeated yourself and called it a phrase
Is 1 apple (single) less than 2 apples (multiple)?
To convert, you use that sentence
now I know my ABCs
Amounts matters
No but isn’t the same as 2 apples is it?
next time won't you sing with me
One apple is one apple because part of said apple contains apple
we are getting a glimspe of what the next decade will read like
@Xesvq But it is two apples in the begaining
Begaining
Think about it
oops typos
2 apples is 1 apple because part of 2 apples is 1 apple
?
Beginning *
No
2 apples is 1 apple because part of 1 apple is 1 apple
What
