Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 662501750166781993


2020-01-03 03:42:01 UTC  

definitely read it lol

2020-01-03 03:42:25 UTC  

It’s like 4 am and that’s too bright

2020-01-03 03:42:27 UTC  

Fact check me, i dare ya

2020-01-03 03:42:33 UTC  

lol

2020-01-03 03:42:34 UTC  

ah, okay

2020-01-03 03:42:37 UTC  

xD

2020-01-03 03:42:44 UTC  

there is not a single factual assertion in your entire google doc

2020-01-03 03:42:51 UTC  

just non-sequiturs

2020-01-03 03:43:20 UTC  

What about this in it:

Yeah, i proved murder and abortion to be functionally the same but they are equationally different so eh
Murder = possible age of death + possible method of death

While

Abortion = possible age of death + possible method of death

Born historically / Historical birth are forms of born/birth = entering something for the first time.
IE: Keeping the whole forever, waiving whole to parts, take out parts you don't like, keep the parts you do like forever, go back to whole kept forever with the part you do like kept forever and it eliminates the other parts.

Current/past/future person = ages

Two people are walking in a hallway, they bump into each other. They directly wanted to walk in the hallway, but indirectly wanted to bump into each other. If they knew of the possible risk, they accept it. If they didn't know the risk at all [an even more accident], then they don't accept it.
Please refrain from telling that to certain people, you know who I am talking about xD

2020-01-03 03:43:41 UTC  

Not word by word though

2020-01-03 03:44:00 UTC  

‘Laws are laws because part of a law is law’

2020-01-03 03:44:07 UTC  

That’s the furthest I got

2020-01-03 03:44:29 UTC  

It is a functional scale if you got the refrence

2020-01-03 03:44:41 UTC  

lol

2020-01-03 03:44:46 UTC  

Crime is crime because part of the crime is crime

2020-01-03 03:44:52 UTC  

Yup

2020-01-03 03:44:55 UTC  

It’s just repeating itself

2020-01-03 03:44:56 UTC  

ravings of absolute madman

2020-01-03 03:45:14 UTC  

That’s not even thesiable with the proper understanding of common English

2020-01-03 03:45:20 UTC  

yeah

2020-01-03 03:45:25 UTC  

he doesn't have a good grasp of english

2020-01-03 03:45:33 UTC  

but he's pretending he's a native speaker for some reason

2020-01-03 03:45:39 UTC  

You’re just stating the physical features mutilating with more of the same

2020-01-03 03:45:51 UTC  

Trump is trump because part of trump is trump

2020-01-03 03:46:06 UTC  

The laws (multiple) is law (single), because part of law (part) is law (single)

2020-01-03 03:46:29 UTC  

You just repeat it 4 times

2020-01-03 03:46:33 UTC  

it is a functional conversion comparison

2020-01-03 03:46:48 UTC  

4 is 4 because part of 4 is 4

2020-01-03 03:46:52 UTC  

my money is still on this being a David Wynn Miller con victim

2020-01-03 03:46:54 UTC  

You just repeat it

2020-01-03 03:47:03 UTC  

But there is just the amount that matters

2020-01-03 03:47:19 UTC  

OMG let me double down on confederate Texan

2020-01-03 03:47:51 UTC  

You just repeated yourself and called it a phrase

2020-01-03 03:48:08 UTC  

Is 1 apple (single) less than 2 apples (multiple)?

2020-01-03 03:48:23 UTC  

To convert, you use that sentence

2020-01-03 03:48:25 UTC  

now I know my ABCs

2020-01-03 03:48:28 UTC  

Amounts matters

2020-01-03 03:48:28 UTC  

No but isn’t the same as 2 apples is it?

2020-01-03 03:48:30 UTC  

next time won't you sing with me

2020-01-03 03:48:46 UTC  

One apple is one apple because part of said apple contains apple

2020-01-03 03:48:58 UTC  

we are getting a glimspe of what the next decade will read like