but he's pretending he's a native speaker for some reason

You’re just stating the physical features mutilating with more of the same

Trump is trump because part of trump is trump

The laws (multiple) is law (single), because part of law (part) is law (single)

You just repeat it 4 times

it is a functional conversion comparison

4 is 4 because part of 4 is 4

my money is still on this being a David Wynn Miller con victim

You just repeat it

But there is just the amount that matters

OMG let me double down on confederate Texan

You just repeated yourself and called it a phrase

Is 1 apple (single) less than 2 apples (multiple)?

To convert, you use that sentence

now I know my ABCs

Amounts matters

No but isn’t the same as 2 apples is it?

next time won't you sing with me

One apple is one apple because part of said apple contains apple

we are getting a glimspe of what the next decade will read like

@Xesvq But it is two apples in the begaining

Begaining

Think about it

oops typos

2 apples is 1 apple because part of 2 apples is 1 apple

?

Beginning *

No

2 apples is 1 apple because part of 1 apple is 1 apple

lol

What

What happens the other apple

It only applies to law

Did you get hungry

Legit I want my apple back

You clearly don't get law logic

Clearly you ate my apple

You’re saying that

If you violate the law, did you violate all of them? No, you violated part?

So your saying

You sir, have won the idiot award