And when you lose power you lose everything
There has to be a place between non interventionist and endless war. I’d like to think we reconsider our policy after we’ve sent a generation to the same country.
GG @jackpumpkin, you just advanced to level 2!
What change would you make?
Well I wouldn’t have invaded Iraq. That’s been well debated.
Future policy is the only thing that matters now
I would let Shia and Sunnis have there civil war.
Their*
I think it’s important to have a foothold in the region
Otherwise other countries will take power
What if China decided to.
What if Russia and China decided to
That place was/is the liberal world order the US mostly enforces
US plays referee, which discourages other countries from having arms races
Nice view, what are you 12?
when we start to get 'selfish' we lose that securiy benefit. it's counterintuitive to those who don't think beyond one or two steps
That's very constructive, @DH2014.
Hey man I’m just saying
Trump is bad for the US, and her free market
Care to elaborate?
Trumps protectionism which culminated in the trade war is harming not only corporations but the people who work for them too
GG @DH2014, you just advanced to level 3!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-security-blast-embassy/us-embassy-urges-citizens-to-depart-iraq-immediately-statement-idUSKBN1Z20NR
I'll fix it
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-john-bolton-iran-assassination-20200103-6xfsnagacbg5rev7gjilar5iky-story.html
Wow the gang of 8 wasn’t briefed?
This is impeachable
Two Asterix
Donald J. Trump**
Vlad i owe you buddy
your Bolton theory is going to lead to my wedding
We should just nukes Tehran tbh
This doesn’t remotely fall under war powers or the AUMF
Not worth sending any of our precious money to burn there
Nuke the midddle east
This was a strategic move by trump and was a good move.
Lol
@!GoldenKingship! agree
clearly the opposite of a strategic move
How retarded are you mate @!GoldenKingship!
Ohononknono this cope
