Message from @jackpumpkin

Discord ID: 662709080258772993


2020-01-03 17:17:29 UTC  

We can but we can't because we enforce a global order that is quite beneficial to our security. We go about it in these reflexive, ego-satisfying ways, like @Neokrates comments there

2020-01-03 17:17:59 UTC  

what’s wrong is that an entertainment organization that has nothing to do with the government and is solely existent for the production of entertaining people, takes advantage of their voice on social media and apologizes to iran for Trumps doings?
it’s illogical in my eyes.

2020-01-03 17:18:00 UTC  

also, when the people who do serious foreign policy homework talk, the same people also don't listen either, like Fiona Hill, etc

2020-01-03 17:18:12 UTC  

or Rep Slotkin whom was a CIA analyst for a career

2020-01-03 17:18:16 UTC  

as in that tweet thread

2020-01-03 17:21:14 UTC  

Why isn't there a foreign policy debate channel?

2020-01-03 17:23:41 UTC  

you're here

2020-01-03 17:23:55 UTC  

@jackpumpkin Islam is responsible for all the turmoil in the Middle East. Name another religion that is causing such strife

2020-01-03 17:24:29 UTC  

@Sh0t Saudi Arabia is also an issue. They’re not an ally I would have chosen

2020-01-03 17:25:14 UTC  

Your a troll dude.

2020-01-03 17:25:32 UTC  

You’re

2020-01-03 17:25:51 UTC  

I didn’t suggest they weren’t responsible.

2020-01-03 17:26:00 UTC  

Lol I’m not British

2020-01-03 17:26:13 UTC  
2020-01-03 17:26:41 UTC  

@jackpumpkin so we agree then

2020-01-03 17:27:00 UTC  

No I don’t believe in endless wars.

2020-01-03 17:27:17 UTC  

i love hearing the Trump air strikes

2020-01-03 17:27:22 UTC  

puts a smile on my face

2020-01-03 17:28:03 UTC  

If you ignore the rest of the world it will catch up to you eventually. Non-interventionist = surrendering power

2020-01-03 17:28:18 UTC  

And when you lose power you lose everything

2020-01-03 17:29:17 UTC  

There has to be a place between non interventionist and endless war. I’d like to think we reconsider our policy after we’ve sent a generation to the same country.

2020-01-03 17:29:17 UTC  

GG @jackpumpkin, you just advanced to level 2!

2020-01-03 17:29:59 UTC  

What change would you make?

2020-01-03 17:30:50 UTC  

Well I wouldn’t have invaded Iraq. That’s been well debated.

2020-01-03 17:31:25 UTC  

Future policy is the only thing that matters now

2020-01-03 17:32:00 UTC  

I would let Shia and Sunnis have there civil war.

2020-01-03 17:32:05 UTC  

Their*

2020-01-03 17:32:24 UTC  

I think it’s important to have a foothold in the region

2020-01-03 17:32:41 UTC  

Otherwise other countries will take power

2020-01-03 17:34:12 UTC  

What if China decided to.

2020-01-03 17:34:27 UTC  

What if Russia and China decided to

2020-01-03 17:45:46 UTC  

That place was/is the liberal world order the US mostly enforces

2020-01-03 17:46:08 UTC  

US plays referee, which discourages other countries from having arms races

2020-01-03 17:46:21 UTC  

Nice view, what are you 12?

2020-01-03 17:46:31 UTC  

when we start to get 'selfish' we lose that securiy benefit. it's counterintuitive to those who don't think beyond one or two steps

2020-01-03 18:06:26 UTC  

That's very constructive, @DH2014.

2020-01-03 18:07:17 UTC  

Hey man I’m just saying

2020-01-03 18:07:38 UTC  

Trump is bad for the US, and her free market

2020-01-03 18:09:07 UTC  

Care to elaborate?

2020-01-03 18:09:57 UTC  

Trumps protectionism which culminated in the trade war is harming not only corporations but the people who work for them too

2020-01-03 18:09:57 UTC  

GG @DH2014, you just advanced to level 3!