Yes that's when I made up my mind that you're pretty hopeless

I hardly know who he is

You even agreed to me on nuclear energy being the greenest

yeah, ofcourse

Trump hardly knows Stone too

then why are all politics throwing out propaganda against green energy

@Deleted User

Lol?

Well the nuclear thing I commended you on

don't miss the quote

It's a political play, they're trying to scare you to get control

It's by far not as bad as they claim it to be

Right, the scientists are

They are all in the pockets of Soros and Friends

"scientists" are also framed

they just happen to ignore nobel prize winners and everything

Yeah but you're saying most of them are

No I'm saying that

"We of the corporation advise you to take our product"

Since most of them are contrary to your view, you're either smarter than them or there's a huge global conspiracy

But of course we also went over how you can easily do many of the experiments in your own home - particularly with regards to how serious CO2 is as a greenhouse gas

You posted the water vapor thing

I explained why it's wrong AND posted a source completely debunking that very "argument". You ignored all of it and went on.

4% H2O and 0.038% of Co2 which Co2 blocks only certain radiation most of it is blocked by H2O

Methane even makes a bigger case than Co2

If anything then reduce the meat industry

Who's vouching for everyone to go vegetarian?

I explained why that's irrelevant already, as well as posting multiple sources actually explaining why what you're saying is silly

They're the biggest contributor to Co2

yes, even surpasses energy

Can't you see it's all framed to fit a political agenda

CO2 amplifies the effects of water vapor, for example. It creates a feedback loop

and then refuse to invest in nuclear energy

You're looking at raw percents of what's in the atmosphere and making it seem like you understand lol. But you don't

Do you know how much of anything there should be in the atmosphere?

No I'm looking at all the factors they purposely left out of the equation and then compared them

What's an acceptable amount of methane? CO2? At what point is it harmful to humans?

if the meat industry is the biggest contributor to Co2 then why is there no campaign against it

You're comparing apples to oranges

isn't that curious?

you don't think that's weird?