Message from @Cuccolover

Discord ID: 677137932297175052


2020-02-12 13:00:41 UTC  

Right, the scientists are

2020-02-12 13:00:53 UTC  

They are all in the pockets of Soros and Friends

2020-02-12 13:00:53 UTC  

"scientists" are also framed

2020-02-12 13:01:02 UTC  

they just happen to ignore nobel prize winners and everything

2020-02-12 13:01:05 UTC  

Yeah but you're saying most of them are

2020-02-12 13:01:17 UTC  

No I'm saying that

2020-02-12 13:01:29 UTC  

"We of the corporation advise you to take our product"

2020-02-12 13:01:29 UTC  

Since most of them are contrary to your view, you're either smarter than them or there's a huge global conspiracy

2020-02-12 13:02:13 UTC  

But of course we also went over how you can easily do many of the experiments in your own home - particularly with regards to how serious CO2 is as a greenhouse gas

2020-02-12 13:02:18 UTC  

You posted the water vapor thing

2020-02-12 13:02:46 UTC  

I explained why it's wrong AND posted a source completely debunking that very "argument". You ignored all of it and went on.

2020-02-12 13:02:57 UTC  

4% H2O and 0.038% of Co2 which Co2 blocks only certain radiation most of it is blocked by H2O

2020-02-12 13:03:19 UTC  

Methane even makes a bigger case than Co2

2020-02-12 13:03:28 UTC  

If anything then reduce the meat industry

2020-02-12 13:03:37 UTC  

Who's vouching for everyone to go vegetarian?

2020-02-12 13:03:43 UTC  

I explained why that's irrelevant already, as well as posting multiple sources actually explaining why what you're saying is silly

2020-02-12 13:03:47 UTC  

They're the biggest contributor to Co2

2020-02-12 13:04:00 UTC  

yes, even surpasses energy

2020-02-12 13:04:14 UTC  

Can't you see it's all framed to fit a political agenda

2020-02-12 13:04:15 UTC  

CO2 amplifies the effects of water vapor, for example. It creates a feedback loop

2020-02-12 13:04:23 UTC  

and then refuse to invest in nuclear energy

2020-02-12 13:04:44 UTC  

You're looking at raw percents of what's in the atmosphere and making it seem like you understand lol. But you don't

2020-02-12 13:04:59 UTC  

Do you know how much of anything there should be in the atmosphere?

2020-02-12 13:05:03 UTC  

No I'm looking at all the factors they purposely left out of the equation and then compared them

2020-02-12 13:05:17 UTC  

What's an acceptable amount of methane? CO2? At what point is it harmful to humans?

2020-02-12 13:05:22 UTC  

if the meat industry is the biggest contributor to Co2 then why is there no campaign against it

2020-02-12 13:05:23 UTC  

You're comparing apples to oranges

2020-02-12 13:05:34 UTC  

isn't that curious?

2020-02-12 13:05:41 UTC  

you don't think that's weird?

2020-02-12 13:06:01 UTC  

if our energy sources should be revamped and we use nuclear energy already, why not invest more into nuclear energy? why revamp the whole thing?

2020-02-12 13:06:04 UTC  

that makes sense to you?

2020-02-12 13:06:05 UTC  

I think there are many campaigns against it lol

2020-02-12 13:06:25 UTC  

Reducing the number of animal products we consume is a cornerstone of most eco movements

2020-02-12 13:06:29 UTC  

no there's literally none in fact most countries purposely overproduce and throw away 1/3rd of it all

2020-02-12 13:06:39 UTC  

and the government even pays for it

2020-02-12 13:07:06 UTC  

can't post pics ugh

2020-02-12 13:07:13 UTC  

Ok there are no campaigns against eating animals

2020-02-12 13:07:15 UTC  

Yep

2020-02-12 13:08:17 UTC  

Most of the meat goes to fast food, you don't think it's curious nobody put a halt on that

2020-02-12 13:08:22 UTC  

it's all distraction