I was saying that the LOE doesn't apply to Big Bang.

> And carbon dating is just relative to other carbon datings. So it's only as accurate as another carbon dating measurement is which in turn is also only as accurate as another one.

No that's not how carbon dating works, it can't be relative. That doesn't make sense.

> And saying that the existence of God's not within the Realms of science makes no sense. If you go back and you look at the creation of this Earth, there are so many things that just don't make sense when your "science" says how it began. The Big Bang Theory cannot work because matter cannot be created or destroyed, so saying that two particles created everything that exists is completely preposterous. Although microevolution is a possibility, macro-evolution is not. We did not come from monkeys or bacteria/little amoebas

You don't understand the big bang theory, there is the initial singularity, ekyprotic universe, or hartle hawking state. Furthermore the thing that matter cannot be created or destroyed is for energy. https://math.vanderbilt.edu/schectex/courses/wolfram.html

Macro evolution is, we don't come from monkeys. It's a common ancestor, it's just a common misconception.

there's something of a process that often occurs; polytheistic pantheons end up being subsumed into a single monotheosit/henotheistic god and their children or servants and such
often parallel to the uniting of diverse groups of people in society into a larger civilisation with a unified rulership

You ever noticed this happens a lot?

Lol @ religious people who say things like "your 'science'...". Shows you where their heads are.

Yeah it's MY science, all mine

They’re saying that like facts/truths are subjective

If it has been proven, then it is not subjective or “your science”

There are not facts only calculated probabilities

If I am not mistaken, carbon dating works when you compare the amount of carbon-14 to carbon-12 Atoms, right?

Because if the ratio changes over time, they don't exactly know what year it was at what ratio. So they would say things like "This is older than this because it has a different ratio." And I say your science because it's not mine, and not a lot of other people's either.

Yes

Well actually no

The amount of carbon-14 atoms is looked at because they decay over time. How much they have decayed and how many are left is what is used. I’m not sure if thats determined proportionally to other samples or carbon-12 atoms

the carbon-14 atoms are spawns of satan

meant to steer the good people away from god

Demon: "Lord Satan, what evil plan do you have to steer the human race away from God today? Fire, plagues, death?"

Satan: "No, something far worse"

Demon: "what could be worse than a plague? "

Satan: "CARBON 14, MUAHAHAHA"

@Cheeki Breeki bruh you got it all wrong

thinking satan is all fire and fucking doom is stupid af

Was trying to make a joke dude

yeah @Cheeki Breeki satan doesn't put carbon 14 atoms in living things to mislead people cuz he dont exist stupid 😂 😆

lol nice user

Believe what you want...

Isn’t that literally the basis of this channel..?

What a mighty wise guy we gots ova heeyah, eh?

That was my point. Spelling nazi just claimed that there is no devil and provided no evidence to back ot up. "He doesn't exist stupid." Someone get that man a philosophy degree

I can provide plenty of evidence as to why Christianity is real but usually in an argument you are supposed to make a claim and provide evidence to back it up.

@Cheeki Breeki *it

@Cheeki Breeki How is Christianity real when the trinity violates the Law of Identity?

lets see the evidence

im more than fine with someone being religious so long as they arent authoritarian about it but claiming you are actually certain about it is when it turns into something irrational

but anyway yeah what do you got

I don't really feel like anyone needs to defend the logic of the Trinity since most Christians I've met tend to explain that it is beyond understanding anyway

Which if there is such a superior being, it would make sense we wouldn't have the same level of understanding

Also the way that I learned to explain it having attended a Christian school was that the Trinity is like an apple

so the core is God, the actual fruit substance is Jesus, and then the Holy Spirit is the skin

All different beings but still part of the same original being

Like an apple

@Deleted User

@Missy That's the god of gaps fallacy. Just because we haven't advanced that far doesn't mean it justifies the existence of God.

That's a sunday school definition. x = x = x < This is false.

It's the fact that God has more than one identity (TF, THS, TS) which goes against the LOI.

god is a man

<:milady:591248801189330944>