Message from @Sauropithicus
Discord ID: 677744616094695444
^
irrelevant argument
And then individuals labor became so much more valuable as a result of the innovations that they could afford for their children not to work
You see this shit with sweatshops in cambodia
Little children working in the sweatshops because the alternative is to starve to fucking death
I carried more weight in textbooks on my back as a kids going school than any slave in the field.
So then they crush the sweatshops?
. *
So what happens?
Children fucking starved to death and children became prostitutes.
little boys and girls
dead and basically raped
why do you have this reformist mindset?
because of government intervention
I don't want to implement socialism through reform I want a complete change
Abolitionist mindset *
I don't want to make the capitalists better I want to kill them
It sucks to be a kid wanting to make some money working at the snowball stand.
I want the fucking state gone thats it
We already know that
that's abolitionist
I want the state abolished
Just as the abolitionists wanted slavery abolished
you assume that i'm a reformist
Just let them be free, thats the answer
"Children... starved to death and children became prostitutes"
My point is that any government intervention leads to worse shit
As if that wouldn't be addressed at the same time
idc about freedom
What do you care about?
freedom can screw off
Ok well my point is that it stops little children from starving to death, dying of cholera, and being raped just to live a meager existence
I care about promoting morality and the interests that pertain to people of European descent, if we're talking about politics
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 6!
your point is irrelevant
I think that child mortality can screw off
because that would be addressed too
you assume that we have to go one issue at a time
it's a bad mindset
ok what is the point of your username