Hence the idea that immigration from asia is the cause of this is ludicrous

Once again, you're taking half of my argument and twisting it

No I'm really not

I honestly dislike London as the capital city.

It has fallen from the beauty it once was

I ***specifically have said over and over that immigration is only part of a wider issue*** and you continue to say "but this is pr00f immigration no issue"

Not really

Gaymer moment.

Liverpool is the East London of the North

My claim was literally nothing more than the fact that, for whatever reason, ethnic minorities, meaning not just asians but all ethnic minorities, are much more likely to commit crime, especially in inner cities. I believe this is because of a toxic inner city culture, that promotes young boys from poor minority households to participate in gang culture and so on and so forth.

Hated by Parliament

Ok but that's entirely removed from what you were originally saying

This rhetoric that you were using earlier is what I was taking the most issue with

If you have now changed your stance on how immigrants contribute to crime statistics fine but I doubt you've changed your opinions that dramatically in the space of an hour

Yes, I said that, because it's true. I still agree with that statement. I'm claiming that it contributes to a wider problem.

Just because I did not elaborate several hours ago on a question not yet asked does not mean I have somehow changed my stance

But whenever I say that you are talking about immigrants you say **"No I'm not talking about immigrants"**

You're outright lying about what I've said.

***Not just specifically immigrants***

I **was**, several hours ago, specifically talking about immigration, then the conversation shifted. If you can't follow the conversation then I can't hold your hand through it

I'm sorry if I've misinterpreted it but when you say **"and not peaceful migrants coming to society, but migrants transferring all the problems of their old country"** it sounds like you're saying that its the migrants who have brought these problems

And I think thats how anyone would interpret that statement

And I know more recently you've said its not to do with migrants specifically

But that woud then indicate that you no longer thin that migrants are the cause of these problems

I don't understand how this is so hard for you to understand, that the topic of a conversation can change over several hours.

When you implied they were the cause of these problems an hour ago

I'm not saying the topic has changed

And no, it doesn't, no reasonable person would believe that me elaborating on an issue somehow means I no longer thing one portion of that issue is a problem

I'm saying you are now talking about the same problems as you were earlier but you're now saying that something else is the cause

peaceful migrants

is oxymoronic

Anyway this discussion has gone long past the point of being contstructive so I'm gonna fuck off

A good analogy would be me saying "I like dogs," and then slightly later saying "I like cats." Then you say "so you no longer like dogs huh? You've changed your view!"

cya

All immigrants no matter what color they are will never be peaceful.

Eh, "cya" then lemon.

I've noticed many conversations I have with those on the left end this way. Once the conversations stops going their way, and the data presents a backing for my argument, they muddy the water with mind numbing loops of semantics until one side gives up

YOU HAVE NOT SEND ANY DATA THAT SUPPORTS YOUR ARGUMENT JESUS

You don't even have a clear argument

You've only sent one table that shows some vague correlation and absolutely no causation