**which of these sources do you want to talk about first**

They are all the same.

We are talking about race and IQ so i think its all relevant with these studies because thats what they include.

yes, but these are each individual studies with individual research that prove your point

since you want to use them

I have many more studies i can link since it apears there isnt a sufficent amount ot choose from.

we should actually review them

in order for you to actually argue your point using them

Are we reviewing or debating, Whats your counter arguemnt to mine?

we're debating, you posted sources, i'm asking you to review these sources in order to show how they prove your point so we can have a coherent debate

okay.

you know what, i'll start off

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01066706?utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=3_nsn6445_brand_PID4003003&utm_content=de_textlink

this is the second source you posted, i believe

the abstract from here

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 3!

"Psychological tests at 8 months and at 4 years of age were administered to 129 children of interracial (Negro-white) matings in the Collaborative Study. These interracial children were divided into two groups, depending on whether the mother was the white or the Negro partner. Stanford-Binet IQs of the 4-year-old children of white mothers averaged approximately 9 points higher than those with Negro mothers (p<0.01). The only behavioral difference on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 8 months of age was in favor of the interracial children of Negro mothers (p<0.05). The results are interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that postnatal environmental factors make a very substantial contribution to racial differences in intelligence test performance."

i'm assuming you're supposing this proves your point because the interracial children have higher IQ's than the black children alone

am i right

That is a study.

**Yes, it is a study.**

am i right though

I am showing whites overall have higher IQ's and that's what these studies have conclusively hypothesized correctly.

in relations to blacks

golden am i right or not

okay, you know what

Yes

cool

i disagree with your statement, the point of me asking is because there is a similar study in which black children are adopted by white families, specifically having white mothers

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-24139-001

in this study you'll find both black and biracial children score high (on par with their white counterparts), presumably due to how culturally white mothers teach vs black mothers teach

as a matter of a fact, the researchers of your study said the same thing was a possibility

here's a quote from your source

" The results suggested that maternal influences of
intellectual functioning are substantial and placed in doubt the validity of the
genetic argument regarding the cause of mean racial differences in IQ. "

this is also at a age in which IQ variation and consistancy is more dependent on genes as well

No necessarily true, i would say genetics do have an involvement.

okay, that's fair to say, but once again your belief or standpoint is that genes are responsible for the gap

and mines is that it's the enviorment

I would say it is yes the DNA.

alright, is that all you have to say in response to my counter arguement?