Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 632265925915312128


2019-10-11 17:13:32 UTC  

are you open to debate about it

2019-10-11 17:14:23 UTC  

I already have.

2019-10-11 17:14:37 UTC  

with me?

2019-10-11 17:15:11 UTC  

I have shown you plenty of evidence that proves my argument.

2019-10-11 17:15:30 UTC  

alright, cool

2019-10-11 17:15:42 UTC  

i'll respond to all of that, but i'm trying to make sure we're on the same page here

2019-10-11 17:15:49 UTC  

you just kept posting random sources

2019-10-11 17:16:00 UTC  

you posted a whole book, as if i was supposed to read it within 5 seconds or something

2019-10-11 17:16:45 UTC  

No these are sources that directly correlate to racial differences and why we are able to use IQ to make determinations.

2019-10-11 17:16:56 UTC  

okay

2019-10-11 17:17:13 UTC  

my point being in order for this to be a coherent debate we gotta stay on the same page

2019-10-11 17:17:20 UTC  

These are studies not mad by toddler, actual people from the scientific community.

2019-10-11 17:17:30 UTC  

**okay**.

2019-10-11 17:17:43 UTC  

which of these sources do you want to talk about first

2019-10-11 17:17:46 UTC  

You think its offesnive to be saying blacks in general overwhelmingly have lower IQ's that for say Whites

2019-10-11 17:17:52 UTC  

Its Fact

2019-10-11 17:17:56 UTC  

**never stated if i do or do not**

2019-10-11 17:18:03 UTC  

**which of these sources do you want to talk about first**

2019-10-11 17:18:17 UTC  

They are all the same.

2019-10-11 17:18:42 UTC  

We are talking about race and IQ so i think its all relevant with these studies because thats what they include.

2019-10-11 17:19:03 UTC  

yes, but these are each individual studies with individual research that prove your point

2019-10-11 17:19:10 UTC  

since you want to use them

2019-10-11 17:19:11 UTC  

I have many more studies i can link since it apears there isnt a sufficent amount ot choose from.

2019-10-11 17:19:13 UTC  

we should actually review them

2019-10-11 17:19:24 UTC  

in order for you to actually argue your point using them

2019-10-11 17:19:54 UTC  

Are we reviewing or debating, Whats your counter arguemnt to mine?

2019-10-11 17:20:35 UTC  

we're debating, you posted sources, i'm asking you to review these sources in order to show how they prove your point so we can have a coherent debate

2019-10-11 17:21:04 UTC  

okay.

2019-10-11 17:21:13 UTC  

you know what, i'll start off

2019-10-11 17:21:28 UTC  

this is the second source you posted, i believe

2019-10-11 17:21:37 UTC  

the abstract from here

2019-10-11 17:21:37 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 3!

2019-10-11 17:21:46 UTC  

"Psychological tests at 8 months and at 4 years of age were administered to 129 children of interracial (Negro-white) matings in the Collaborative Study. These interracial children were divided into two groups, depending on whether the mother was the white or the Negro partner. Stanford-Binet IQs of the 4-year-old children of white mothers averaged approximately 9 points higher than those with Negro mothers (p<0.01). The only behavioral difference on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 8 months of age was in favor of the interracial children of Negro mothers (p<0.05). The results are interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that postnatal environmental factors make a very substantial contribution to racial differences in intelligence test performance."

2019-10-11 17:22:10 UTC  

2019-10-11 17:22:25 UTC  

i'm assuming you're supposing this proves your point because the interracial children have higher IQ's than the black children alone

2019-10-11 17:22:30 UTC  

am i right

2019-10-11 17:22:51 UTC  

That is a study.

2019-10-11 17:23:02 UTC  

**Yes, it is a study.**

2019-10-11 17:23:24 UTC  

am i right though

2019-10-11 17:24:28 UTC  

I am showing whites overall have higher IQ's and that's what these studies have conclusively hypothesized correctly.