No thats a fact

it's not, hence why we're debating about it right now

now

Proven by the science community

you posted the minnesota transracial adoption study and referred to it

There have been studies all over that vastly prove what i am saying.

ive already opened up my counter arguement to you refuting it and explaining how it helps develop my point

you referred to it a second time without addressing said counter arguement

i'm assuming

if that graph is from the minnesota transracial adoption study, which i believe it is

Even james watson in his sudies have proven so.

are you open to debate about it

I already have.

with me?

I have shown you plenty of evidence that proves my argument.

alright, cool

i'll respond to all of that, but i'm trying to make sure we're on the same page here

you just kept posting random sources

you posted a whole book, as if i was supposed to read it within 5 seconds or something

No these are sources that directly correlate to racial differences and why we are able to use IQ to make determinations.

okay

my point being in order for this to be a coherent debate we gotta stay on the same page

These are studies not mad by toddler, actual people from the scientific community.

**okay**.

which of these sources do you want to talk about first

You think its offesnive to be saying blacks in general overwhelmingly have lower IQ's that for say Whites

Its Fact

**never stated if i do or do not**

**which of these sources do you want to talk about first**

They are all the same.

We are talking about race and IQ so i think its all relevant with these studies because thats what they include.

yes, but these are each individual studies with individual research that prove your point

since you want to use them

I have many more studies i can link since it apears there isnt a sufficent amount ot choose from.

we should actually review them

in order for you to actually argue your point using them

Are we reviewing or debating, Whats your counter arguemnt to mine?

we're debating, you posted sources, i'm asking you to review these sources in order to show how they prove your point so we can have a coherent debate

okay.

you know what, i'll start off

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01066706?utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=3_nsn6445_brand_PID4003003&utm_content=de_textlink