Sure, then go piss of elsewhere

cuckhold

Edgy teenager who thinks he's a "fascist"

How stupid are you?

How old are you, i am willing to BET i am older than you

You look ridiculous

Shh

Typing out another rant?

Triggered much?

hmm, someone who continuesly resorts to insults after being pointed out how irrational they are, is NOT ridiculous, but someone actually having a geniune discussion IS?

Lol, such a child honestly

Move along then. People who write off Wikipedia and try to inject garbage like Stefan into conversations don't need a podium

Ill leave this conversation now, who was the irrational and emotionally unstable one is left for others to infer. However its self evident.

Literally every leftist I've spoken to cannot have an intellectual discussion without resorting to childish unstable screeching

So people who disagree with you? Such rationality!

You said you're leaving

https://tenor.com/view/cosby-bill-bill-cosby-popsicle-yum-gif-5777940

Very mature and intelligent. Thanks for making your side look even worse. Bye now

Stefan i dunno man, i dont think he's a hardcore racist

GG @Sh0t, you just advanced to level 6!

Been watching him since low def. his sucking off of trump is the real problem

Though, he often talks about facts and feelings, yet ive seen him get really emotional and use illogic when pushed

responding to fairly good arguments with "not an argument" which is ridiculous

Remember the good ole days when Stefan and Milo did a bunch of episodes together lol. poor milo

@Gоd Twin studies literally do not control for socioeconomic factors. It's usually only economic ones

@Alexstrasza no, i don't have a problem with the alternative hypothesis. I also don't really know why you came up with that response, the only point you've made is that black people are more likely to do more dangerous drugs supposedly

🆙 | **Ultimis Abel☆ leveled up!**

that doesn't subvert or undermine his point at all

@Gоd Of course genetics do play a role in IQ, but this in and of itself doesn't automatically refute the environmentalist arguement

first off these twin studies do not account for environment, at the same time this doesn't exactly disprove their findings, but it also doesn't disprove that the environment children are placed in can significantly hinder them

if two children are placed in two significantly different environments then there will be a deviation regardless of how related they are

if i put one kid with a family of richy rich he's gonna be smart as hell, and if i placed some kid in some starving village in africa

Yes, it's just a fallacious non sequitur to say that these twin studies disprove that environment may have a larger effect on IQ

**you get the point, both logically and in reality it doesn't add up**

their genes ARE still being expressed of course, and are the main driving force of what their IQ consist of

it's just like any other trait though, if you have a dirt poor environment for that gene to be expressed then it will never even reach its full genetic potential

@Sentient23 stop making fascism look stupid, thank you.

The conversation was not about fascism, idiot @Deleted User

which is why environment is considered along with genetic influences is the cause of genetic variation, the better the environment the more likely genes will be the main cause of variation

and vice versa

there have been studies that prove or go into this