You say?

Too much atheists!

Along with this it'd make prostituton much safer

Because it’s exploitive of women and it’s a moral drain on society. I could care less about muh GDP

Does that mean they won't get pregnant or anything?

It's going to happen either way we might as well protect them

^That’s a defeatist position

Well, I don't like prostitutions tho...

Look, I'd happily try to eliminate it completely but as long as there is a motive of profit prostitution will continue

Nymphomaina is created by society’s who reject traditional morality, and thus because women are liberated they think that it is acceptable to sell their body.

Teens and adults will do oral sex and become atheists, yeah, yeah sure. Good idea, fucking.... Good...

GG @Nogiogo, you just advanced to level 5!

I completely want to eliminate the exploitation of women however I see no way to do it so I want to protect them the most I can.

Morals change, at no point do we need to continue traditional morals. We need to continue justifiable morals

Removing the demand and supply of prostitution starts at the root of what causes sexual hedonism to occur in the first place.

Like, HIV?

Sexual hedonism is not a major issue. Women and men have the absolute moral justification to use their bodies as they wish, however, the key bit is if they wish

Is a moral structure justified in the sense that it teaches men and women to act in away that it would be repulsed by prostitution.

Sexual hedonism is not an issue? Pffft. Look at the divorce rates in the west, the growth of the LGBT and BDSM community.

If you give men and women the ability to be their own moral actors. Do children have the agency to be their own moral actors?

LGBT and BDSM are completely fine to exist and the rise in divorce rates is because of the means of which we use sexuality.

^That example shows your double think

Children do not have the mental capacity to make those choices

Men and women adults have the absolute right to treat themselves as they wish

So you are in favour of restricting morality based on circumstance then.

Children are able to chose their own morals to believe though

If they aren’t their own moral actors, what are they?

But every parent attempts to push their own morals on their children and will restrict their ability to act on those morals

Since they parents birthed them and have the most control over them, are they therefore the property of the parents?

Prostutions will do abortion

Seriously? That's not good...

You're trying to find straw men arguments versus attacking the actual argument

No it’s called Socratic deduction

They are not the property of the parents, however, the parent does have the ability to choose their child's rules and abilities

It's a simple matter of parenthood.

Are you a father??

My question is what are they then?

If they aren’t their own moral actors

And if they aren’t property

What do you consider a moral actor??

What are they?